The unseen universe : $b or, physical speculations on a future stateStewart, Balfour
Religion
The unseen universe : $b or, physical speculations on a future state
Stewart, Balfour
Immortality; Religion and science
30. As a matter of history, it appears that about the time of the
birth of Christ there was an expectation, however vague, that
something of this nature was about to take place. And when Christ
made His appearance, and gathered round Him a little band of
disciples, there can be no doubt that He claimed to be the bearer of
intelligence from the world of spirits. All who accept the gospel
narratives, however much they may differ from one another as to
the light in which they regard His person and doctrine, will yet,
we think, agree in this. The claim made by His disciples for His
gospel was that it ‘had brought life and immortality to light’ (2
Tim. i. 10), and that Christ had by his resurrection ‘abolished
death.’ The grounds of the claim were built upon the belief that He
showed Himself after His resurrection to a body of men who had not
previously believed that the Messiah Himself was to die and rise
again.
His disciples in short took His resurrection for a proof that life is
possible after death. Christ was believed to be the first-fruits of a
system which was destined ultimately to enfold in the same glorious
immortality all those of His disciples who were united to their
Master by a sincere and living faith. Evidently Paul attached the
utmost importance to the fact of Christ’s resurrection, for he says
(1 Cor. xv. 14), ‘If Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain,
and your faith is also vain. Yea, and we are found false witnesses of
God: because we have testified of God that he raised up Christ; whom
he raised not up, if so be that the dead rise not. For if the dead
rise not, then is not Christ raised: and if Christ be not raised,
your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins.’
31. Let us now try to ascertain what sort of future state was taught
by Christ. In the first place, it was a bodily state—a state which
could even adapt itself with some modification to the views of the
Pharisees who believed in the resurrection of the body. But the
modification introduced is sufficiently important. The occasion of
its announcement was a disputation with the Sadducees, who attempted
to perplex Christ by stating to Him the case of a woman who had
been married in this life to seven brethren in succession, and then
asking Him whose wife she should be in the resurrection. We are told
(Matthew xxii. 29) that in reply to this question, ‘Jesus answered
and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the
power of God. For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are
given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.’ We may
gather by implication from this narrative, that the question would
have puzzled the Pharisees, who had certainly not arrived at this
idea of the resurrection state.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account