“But,” said Brinnaria, wide-eyed, “I had supposed that, if Meffia was
suspected, there would be an inquisition and testimony under oath and
that it would be obligatory that the Vestal actually at fault must be
scourged.”
“For once,” the Emperor smiled, “you have failed to read accurately the
statutes of the order. It is positively refreshing. I was beginning to
feel that you were altogether too accurate. In fact the scourging of a
delinquent Vestal is a mere disciplinary regulation, designed to assure
the maintenance of the fire. It is not in the nature of a mandatory
atonement. It has nothing in common with an act of expiation. It has
nothing to do with placating or propitiating the Goddess. It has no
likeness whatever to the punishment of a guilty Vestal.”
“That reminds me,” said Brinnaria, “of what I came for. I’m as grateful
as possible for what you have said to me, surprised that Causidiena and
you so easily saw through my deception, delighted that you take it as
you have, more than delighted to find you so kindly disposed towards me.
I need all the kindness you can feel towards me. I want to come to
the point, to the reason why I am here. I want you to answer me this
question: Suppose I were accused of the worst possible misconduct,
formally accused before you, what then?”
“Then,” said Aurelius, “you would have a fair trial.”
“I believe I should,” said Brinnaria. “You would be perfectly fair and
entirely just. And a fair trial would be a novelty. Almost never has an
accused Vestal had a fair trial.”
“Not even if acquitted?” the Emperor suggested slyly.
“No,” Brinnaria retorted vigorously. “Even most of those absolved were
not tried fairly. Postumia was, if the records from so long ago are to
be trusted. The first trial of the third Licinia was perfectly fair, the
minutes are very full and there is no shade of bias in the discussion of
her many interviews with Crassus, while the court was plainly genuinely
amused at his greed for desirable real-estate and at his artifices to
induce her to sell cheap. Fabia, in the same year, was justly treated.
But most of the other acquittals were quite as bad as most of the
convictions to my mind. I can discover almost no trial where both sides
had a full hearing, where the judges tried to get at the facts and kept
their attention on the evidence, where the finding as the expression of
the opinions rather than of the partiality of the Pontiffs. Almost
every verdict on record, it seems to me, was dictated by favoritism or
influence or prejudice or wrath.”
“You seem to think you know a great deal about the subject of trials of
Vestals,” Aurelius remarked.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account