Detective and mystery stories; Holmes, Sherlock (Fictitious character) -- Fiction; Private investigators -- England -- Fiction
“The famous scientific criminal, as famous among crooks as—”
“My blushes, Watson!” Holmes murmured in a deprecating voice.
“I was about to say, as he is unknown to the public.”
“A touch! A distinct touch!” cried Holmes. “You are developing a
certain unexpected vein of pawky humour, Watson, against which I must
learn to guard myself. But in calling Moriarty a criminal you are
uttering libel in the eyes of the law—and there lie the glory and the
wonder of it! The greatest schemer of all time, the organizer of every
deviltry, the controlling brain of the underworld, a brain which might
have made or marred the destiny of nations—that’s the man! But so aloof
is he from general suspicion, so immune from criticism, so admirable in
his management and self-effacement, that for those very words that you
have uttered he could hale you to a court and emerge with your year’s
pension as a solatium for his wounded character. Is he not the
celebrated author of The Dynamics of an Asteroid, a book which ascends
to such rarefied heights of pure mathematics that it is said that there
was no man in the scientific press capable of criticizing it? Is this a
man to traduce? Foul-mouthed doctor and slandered professor—such would
be your respective rôles! That’s genius, Watson. But if I am spared by
lesser men, our day will surely come.”
“May I be there to see!” I exclaimed devoutly. “But you were speaking
of this man Porlock.”
“Ah, yes—the so-called Porlock is a link in the chain some little way
from its great attachment. Porlock is not quite a sound link—between
ourselves. He is the only flaw in that chain so far as I have been able
to test it.”
“But no chain is stronger than its weakest link.”
“Exactly, my dear Watson! Hence the extreme importance of Porlock. Led
on by some rudimentary aspirations towards right, and encouraged by the
judicious stimulation of an occasional ten-pound note sent to him by
devious methods, he has once or twice given me advance information
which has been of value—that highest value which anticipates and
prevents rather than avenges crime. I cannot doubt that, if we had the
cipher, we should find that this communication is of the nature that I
indicate.”
Again Holmes flattened out the paper upon his unused plate. I rose and,
leaning over him, stared down at the curious inscription, which ran as
follows:
534 C2 13 127 36 31 4 17 21 41 DOUGLAS 109 293 5 37 BIRLSTONE 26
BIRLSTONE 9 47 171
“What do you make of it, Holmes?”
“It is obviously an attempt to convey secret information.”
“But what is the use of a cipher message without the cipher?”
“In this instance, none at all.”
“Why do you say ‘in this instance’?”
“Because there are many ciphers which I would read as easily as I do
the apocrypha of the agony column: such crude devices amuse the
intelligence without fatiguing it. But this is different. It is clearly
a reference to the words in a page of some book. Until I am told which
page and which book I am powerless.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account