Detective and mystery stories; Holmes, Sherlock (Fictitious character) -- Fiction; Private investigators -- England -- Fiction
“All knowledge comes useful to the detective,” remarked Holmes. “Even
the trivial fact that in the year 1865 a picture by Greuze entitled ‘La
Jeune Fille à l’Agneau’ fetched one million two hundred thousand
francs—more than forty thousand pounds—at the Portalis sale may start a
train of reflection in your mind.”
It was clear that it did. The inspector looked honestly interested.
“I may remind you,” Holmes continued, “that the professor’s salary can
be ascertained in several trustworthy books of reference. It is seven
hundred a year.”
“Then how could he buy—”
“Quite so! How could he?”
“Ay, that’s remarkable,” said the inspector thoughtfully. “Talk away,
Mr. Holmes. I’m just loving it. It’s fine!”
Holmes smiled. He was always warmed by genuine admiration—the
characteristic of the real artist. “What about Birlstone?” he asked.
“We’ve time yet,” said the inspector, glancing at his watch. “I’ve a
cab at the door, and it won’t take us twenty minutes to Victoria. But
about this picture: I thought you told me once, Mr. Holmes, that you
had never met Professor Moriarty.”
“No, I never have.”
“Then how do you know about his rooms?”
“Ah, that’s another matter. I have been three times in his rooms, twice
waiting for him under different pretexts and leaving before he came.
Once—well, I can hardly tell about the once to an official detective.
It was on the last occasion that I took the liberty of running over his
papers—with the most unexpected results.”
“You found something compromising?”
“Absolutely nothing. That was what amazed me. However, you have now
seen the point of the picture. It shows him to be a very wealthy man.
How did he acquire wealth? He is unmarried. His younger brother is a
station master in the west of England. His chair is worth seven hundred
a year. And he owns a Greuze.”
“Well?”
“Surely the inference is plain.”
“You mean that he has a great income and that he must earn it in an
illegal fashion?”
“Exactly. Of course I have other reasons for thinking so—dozens of
exiguous threads which lead vaguely up towards the centre of the web
where the poisonous, motionless creature is lurking. I only mention the
Greuze because it brings the matter within the range of your own
observation.”
“Well, Mr. Holmes, I admit that what you say is interesting: it’s more
than interesting—it’s just wonderful. But let us have it a little
clearer if you can. Is it forgery, coining, burglary—where does the
money come from?”
“Have you ever read of Jonathan Wild?”
“Well, the name has a familiar sound. Someone in a novel, was he not? I
don’t take much stock of detectives in novels—chaps that do things and
never let you see how they do them. That’s just inspiration: not
business.”
“Jonathan Wild wasn’t a detective, and he wasn’t in a novel. He was a
master criminal, and he lived last century—1750 or thereabouts.”
“Then he’s no use to me. I’m a practical man.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account