The Valuation of Public Service Corporation Property: Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers,; vol. LXXII, June, 1911, ASCE 1190Riggs, Henry Earle
General
The Valuation of Public Service Corporation Property: Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers,; vol. LXXII, June, 1911, ASCE 1190
"... it fails, in the form in which it was used in 1900 and 1902, to
bring out those negative or subtractive elements which may be
determined from the income accounts, in the case of properties which
do not earn a fair return on the investment."
And again:
"... where the earnings have been fairly uniform and stationary for
a period of years, and the property does not earn a sufficient sum
to care for depreciation and annuity, it is clear that the value as
an earning investment is less than the determined physical value,
and that the physical valuation should be reduced by some amount to
arrive at the 'fair value.'"
In his argument favoring the use of a valuation in rate-making, Mr.
Riggs affords no support to Professor Adams' contention that, for that
purpose, only replacement cost should be considered, and that, after
fixing the rates on the basis of the least favorably located and least
efficient line, so as to afford it a bare return on its replacement
cost, the surplus earnings at the same rates of its more favorably
located or better operated competitors should be confiscated under the
guise of a special tax. This extraordinary proposal, the character of
which is so illuminating as to the attitude toward railway property and
investments of the most prominent and persistent advocate of so-called
"physical valuation," is best stated in Professor Adams' own words,
which are as follows:
"I cannot evade the conclusion that equity, as between various
classes of roads, can never be attained until all the excess of
revenue over the Constitutional limit be made a contribution to the
public treasury, and that this contribution be made as a substitute
for all taxes of all kinds and all sorts."[38]
On the contrary, Mr. Riggs distinctly upholds the right to earnings in
excess of the bare return, at the minimum rate of interest, upon the
cost of replacement, saying, _inter alia_:
"It is contended that the determination of rates that will be just
and fair to all competing companies involves other consideration
than the valuation of either physical or intangible properties, and
that when all these rate-making problems are properly solved, there
will remain large intangible values on the well-designed plants."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account