The Valuation of Public Service Corporation Property: Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers,; vol. LXXII, June, 1911, ASCE 1190Riggs, Henry Earle
General
The Valuation of Public Service Corporation Property: Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers,; vol. LXXII, June, 1911, ASCE 1190
_Legal Expense._—This item is inseparable from the construction
work, and was fixed at one-half of 1% of the cost of the
same items as affected by the engineering charge.
_Organization Expense._—This covered the cost of promotion,
financing, and general supervision of construction, together
with general office expense. These items were covered by an
application of 1½% of the cost of the above items.
_Interest._—This item is intended to cover interest on money
during the period of construction. The length of time taken
to build would, of course, be variable. It was assumed that
3% on the entire cost of construction and equipment would be
conservative, and this figure was used.
_Discount on Bonds._—This was not included, for the reason that
it was considered, not as a proper capital charge, but
rather as an adjustment of the interest rate to the existing
market condition, and as chargeable to interest account and
not capital.
The discussion among members of the staff indicated such a wide range of
opinion as to the proper percentages to apply, that the final
determination of the rates was passed upon by the Board of Review. There
can be no question as to the propriety of these items as proper elements
in the first cost of construction of a new railroad. On the theory that
the cost of reproduction of the physical property should include every
item of expense which would enter into the cost of reproducing the
property as it existed on the date of the appraisal, they are proper
terms to include in the appraisal. As to whether the fixed rates were
high enough in every case, is an open question.
_The Charge of Ten Per Cent. for Contingencies._—Perhaps no single
feature of the Michigan appraisal of physical property has been so
generally criticised as the charge of 10% of the entire estimated cost,
including all the percentage charges, to cover "contingencies."
At the time the first appraisal was made, the writer was not at all
satisfied that such an item, in such amount, should be included. The
reasons advanced were so strong that it was done, and the writer's
subsequent work has fully convinced him that it was proper and
justifiable, because:
(_a_) The conditions under which this particular inventory and
appraisal were made, as to time and lack of co-operation of
the companies, made it practically certain that some items
of value were missed in the appraisal, such as station and
miscellaneous equipment, frogs, switches, track structures,
buildings owned by the companies and occupied by others,
etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account