It is an important fact, and I believe there is hardly an exception
to the rule, that the especial characters for which each breed is
valued are eminently variable: thus, in the Fantail, the number and
direction of the tail-feathers, the carriage of the body, and the
degree of trembling are all highly variable points; in Pouters, the
degree to which they pout, and the shape of their inflated crops;
in the Carrier, the length, narrowness, and curvature of the beak,
and the amount of wattle; in Short-faced Tumblers, the shortness of
the beak, the prominence of the forehead, and general carriage,[31]
and in the Almond-Tumbler the colour of the plumage; in common
Tumblers, the manner of tumbling; in the Barb, the breadth and
shortness of the beak and the amount of eye-wattle; in Runts, the
size of body; in Turbits the frill; and lastly in Trumpeters, the
cooing, as well as the size of the tuft of feathers over the
nostrils. These, which are the distinctive and selected characters
of the several breeds, are all eminently variable.
There is another interesting fact with respect to the characters of
the several breeds, namely, that they are often most strongly
displayed in the male bird. In Carriers, when the males and females
are exhibited in separate pens, the wattle is plainly seen to be
much more developed in the males, though I have seen a hen Carrier
belonging to Mr. Haynes heavily wattled. Mr. Tegetmeier informs me
that, in twenty Barbs in Mr. P. H. Jones’s possession, the males
had generally the largest eye-wattles; Mr. Esquilant also believes
in this rule, but Mr. H. Weir, a first-rate judge, entertains some
doubt on the subject. Male Pouters distend their crops to a much
greater size than do the females; I have, however, seen a hen in
the possession of Mr. Evans which pouted excellently; but this is
an unusual circumstance. Mr. Harrison Weir, a successful breeder of
prize Fantails, informs me that his male birds often have a greater
number of tail-feathers than the females. Mr. Eaton asserts[32]
that if a cock and hen Tumbler were of equal merit, the hen would
be worth double the money; and as pigeons always pair, so that an
equal number of both sexes is necessary for reproduction, this
seems to show that high merit is rarer in the female than in the
male. In the development of the frill in Turbits, of the hood in
Jacobins, of the tuft in Trumpeters, of tumbling in Tumblers, there
is no difference between the males and females. I may here add a
rather different case, namely, the existence in France[33] of a
wine-coloured variety of the Pouter, in which the male is generally
chequered with black, whilst the female is never so chequered. Dr.
Chapuis also remarks[34] that in certain light-coloured pigeons the
males have their feathers striated with black, and these striæ
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account