From the extremely close resemblance in colour, general structure,
and especially in voice, between _Gallus bankiva_ and the Game
fowl; from their fertility, as far as this has been ascertained,
when crossed; from the possibility of the wild species being tamed,
and from its varying in the wild state, we may confidently look at
it as the parent of the most typical of all the domestic breeds,
namely, the Game fowl. It is a significant fact, that almost all
the naturalists in India, namely Sir W. Elliot, Mr. S. N. Ward, Mr.
Layard, Mr. J. C. Jerdon, and Mr. Blyth,[25] who are familiar with
G. bankiva, believe that it is the parent of most or all our
domestic breeds. But even if it be admitted that G. bankiva is the
parent of the Game breed, yet it may be urged that other wild
species have been the parents of the other domestic breeds; and
that these species still exist, though unknown, in some country, or
have become extinct. The extinction, however, of several species of
fowls, is an improbable hypothesis, seeing that the four known
species have not become extinct in the most ancient and thickly
peopled regions of the East. There is, in fact, not one other kind
of domesticated bird, of which the wild parent-form is unknown,
that is become extinct. For the discovery of new, or the
rediscovery of old species of Gallus, we must not look, as fanciers
often look, to the whole world. The larger gallinaceous birds, as
Mr. Blyth has remarked,[26] generally have a restricted range: we
see this well illustrated in India, where the genus Gallus inhabits
the base of the Himalaya, and is succeeded higher up by
Gallophasis, and still higher up by Phasianus. Australia, with its
islands, is out of the question as the home for unknown species of
the genus. It is, also, as improbable that Gallus should inhabit
South America[27] as that a humming-bird should be found in the Old
World. From the character of the other gallinaceous birds of
Africa, it is not probable that Gallus is an African genus. We need
not look to the western parts of Asia, for Messrs. Blyth and
Crawfurd, who have attended to this subject, doubt whether Gallus
ever existed in a wild state even as far west as Persia. Although
the earliest Greek writers speak of the fowl as a Persian bird,
this probably merely indicates its line of importation. For the
discovery of unknown species we must look to India, to the
Indo-Chinese countries, and to the northern parts of the Malay
Archipelago. The southern portion of China is the most likely
country; but as Mr. Blyth informs me, skins have been exported from
China during a long period, and living birds are largely kept there
in aviaries, so that any native species of Gallus would probably
have become known. Mr. Birch, of the British Museum, has translated
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account