World War, 1914-1918 -- Naval operations -- Submarine; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
For, I must repeat, the German navy could maintain in the open Atlantic
an average of only about eight or ten of her efficient U-boats at one
time. The German Admiralty thus had to answer this difficult question:
Shall we use these submarines to attack mercantile convoys or to attack
troop convoys? The submarine flotilla which was actively engaged was so
small that it was absurd to think of sending half into each lane; the
Germans must send most of their submarines against cargo ships or most
of them against troopships. Which should it be? If it were decided to
concentrate on mercantile vessels then the American armies, which the
German chiefs had declared to their people could never get to the
Western Front, would reach France and furnish General Foch the reserves
with which he might crush the German armies before winter. If, on the
other hand, the Germans should decide to concentrate on troopships, then
the food and supplies which were essential to the Allied cause would
flow at an even greater rate into Great Britain and thence to the
European nations. Whether it were more important, in a military sense,
to cut the Allies' commercial lines of communication or to sink troop
transports is an interesting question. It is almost impossible for the
Anglo-Saxon mind to consider this as a purely military matter, apart
from the human factors involved. The sinking of a great transport, with
4,000 or 5,000 American boys on board, would have been a dreadful
calamity and would have struck horror to the American people; it was
something which the Navy was determined to prevent, and which we did
prevent. Considered as a strictly military question, however--and that
was the only consideration which influenced the Germans--it is hard to
see how the loss of one transport, or even the loss of several, would
have materially affected the course of the war. In judging the purely
military results of such a tragedy, we must remember that the Allied
armies were losing from 3,000 to 5,000 men a day; thus the sinking of an
American transport once a week would not have particularly affected the
course of the war. The destruction of merchant shipping in large
quantities, however, represented the one way in which the Germans could
win. There were at least a hundred merchant ships to every one of our
troopships; if a considerable number of the former could be sunk,
Germany would have scored a decisive advantage. From the declaration of
submarine warfare, the objective of the German Admiralty had been for
"tonnage"; by March, 1918, as already said, the chances of destroying
sufficient tonnage to win had become extremely slight; yet it still
represented the one logical mission of the submarine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account