World War, 1914-1918 -- Naval operations -- Submarine; World War, 1914-1918 -- United States
The two alternatives, however, that of attacking mercantile convoys or
troop convoys, hardly existed in fact. Let us suppose for a moment that
the Germans had changed their programme, had taken their group of
operating submarines from the northern trade routes, and had stationed
them to the south, in the track of the troop transports. What would the
results have been? "Lane," though a convenient word for descriptive
purposes, is hardly an accurate one; for this ocean passage-way was
really about 200 miles wide. Imagine eight or ten submarines, stretched
across that expanse and hunting for troopships. At this rate the Germans
would have had about one submarine for every twenty miles. Instead of
finding themselves sailing amid a swarm of surface ships, as they were
when they were stationed in the busy trade routes of the Irish Sea or
the English Channel, the submarines would have found themselves drifting
on a great waste of waters. Our troop convoys averaged not more than
three a week even in the busiest period; in all probability the
submarines would therefore have hung around for a month without catching
a glimpse of one. Even if by some chance the patient vigil should
finally have been rewarded, it is extremely unlikely that the submarine
would ever have found a favourable opportunity to attack. We must keep
in mind that the convoy room at the Admiralty knew, within certain
limits, the location of submarines from day to day; any time one was
located in the track of a troop convoy, therefore, a wireless to the
convoy would have conveyed this information and directed it to reach the
coast of France by another route.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account