The vigilantes of Montana; Or, popular justice in the Rocky Mountains: Being a correct and impartial narrative of the chase, trial, capture and execution of Henry Plummer's road agent band, together with accounts of the lives and crimes of many of the robbers and desperadoes, the whole being interspersed with sketches of life in the mining camps of the "Far West"Dimsdale, Thos. J. (Thomas Josiah)
History
The vigilantes of Montana; Or, popular justice in the Rocky Mountains: Being a correct and impartial narrative of the chase, trial, capture and execution of Henry Plummer's road agent band, together with accounts of the lives and crimes of many of the robbers and desperadoes, the whole being interspersed with sketches of life in the mining camps of the "Far West"
Dimsdale, Thos. J. (Thomas Josiah)
Criminals -- Montana; Frontier and pioneer life -- Montana; Montana -- History -- 19th century; Plummer, Henry Amos, -1864; Vigilance committees
The indignation of the citizens being aroused by this atrocious and
unprovoked massacre, a mass meeting was held the following morning to
take some action in the premises. Charley Moore and Reeves hearing
of it, started early in the morning, on foot, towards Rattlesnake,
Henry Plummer preceding them on horseback. Sentries were then posted
all round the town, to prevent egress, volunteers were called for, to
pursue the criminals, and Messrs. Lear, Higgings, O. J. Rockwell and
Davenport at once followed on their track, coming up with them where
they had hidden, in a thicket of brush, near the creek. The daylight
was beginning to fade, and the cold was intense when a reinforcement
arrived, on which the fugitives came out, delivered themselves up, and
were conducted back to Bannack.
Plummer was tried and honorably acquitted, on account of Cleveland’s
threats. Mitchell was banished, but he hid around the town for awhile,
and never went away. Reeves and Moore were next tried. Mr. Rheem had
promised the evening before to conduct the prosecution, and Judge Smith
had undertaken the defense, when on the morning of the trial, Mr.
Rheem announced that he was retained for the defense. This left the
people without any lawyer or prosecutor. Mr. Coply at last undertook
the case, but his talents not lying in that direction, he was not
successful as an advocate. Judge Hoyt, from St. Paul, was elected
Judge, and Hank Crawford, Sheriff. Owing to the peculiarly divided
state of public opinion, it seemed almost impossible to select an
impartial jury from the neighborhood, and therefore a messenger was
sent to Godfrey’s Canon, where N. P. Langford, R. C. Knox, A. Godfrey,
and others, were engaged in erecting a saw-mill, requesting them
to come down to Bannack and sit on the jury. Messrs. Langford and
Godfrey came down at once, to be ready for the trial the next day. The
assembly of citizens numbered about five or six hundred, and to them
the question was put, “Whether the prisoners should be tried by the
people EN MASSE, or by a selected jury.” Some leading men advocated
the first plan. N. P. Langford and several prominent residents took
the other side, and argued the necessity for a jury. After several
hours’ discussion, a jury was ordered, and the trial proceeded. At the
conclusion of the evidence and argument, the case was given to the jury
without any charge. The Judge also informed them that if they found
the prisoners guilty, they must sentence them. At the first ballot,
the vote stood: For death, 1; against it, 11. The question of the
prisoners’ GUILT admitted of no denial. N. P. Langford alone voted for
the penalty of death. A sealed verdict of banishment and confiscation
of property was ultimately handed to the Judge, late in the evening.
Moore and Reeves were banished from the Territory, but were permitted
to stay at Deer Lodge till the Range would be passable.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account