The Wampanoags in the seventeenth century : $b An ethnohistorical surveyMarten, Catherine
History
The Wampanoags in the seventeenth century : $b An ethnohistorical survey
Marten, Catherine
Indians of North America -- New England -- History -- 17th century; Wampanoag Indians
There will be omissions from the cultural description—questions
never to be answered. But it is hoped that the bringing together in
ethnographic format of what information is extant will give some
insight into and further the understanding of Wampanoag culture as it
was at approximately the time the Pilgrims encountered it.
DEMOGRAPHY
Estimates of population for the southern New England area are
variable. The most widely quoted figure is that arrived at by
Mooney—25,000 for the entire New England area, prior to the 1616-17
plague.[5] Other writers place the number at around 20,000 for
southern New England alone.[6] In all likelihood, the lower number
is the more nearly correct. Population estimates made by visitors to
the New England area in the 16th and 17th centuries were based in the
main upon what could be observed in the course of a coastwide voyage.
And while Indian population appeared dense, the actual situation was
one of a considerably concentrated population along the immediate
coast, where rich marine resources were available, and a very sparse,
often seasonal, occupation of vast tracts further inland.[7]
By the time the Pilgrims arrived, the population of eastern
Massachusetts had declined greatly, as a result of the epidemic
which we have mentioned before. No one really knows what the disease
was that took such great numbers of Indians. The Massachusetts
were virtually destroyed—first by the plague and then by wars with
the Abnaki during the early decades of the seventeenth century.
Population declined from perhaps three thousand to a mere five
hundred between the years 1615 and 1630.[8] The Wampanoags had
suffered less, but the effects of the plague were still felt heavily
by them. Prior to the plague their numbers are estimated to have
been two to three thousand, but death depopulated large tracts of
land.[9] Altham writes that the nearest Indian town to Plymouth was
fourteen miles away.[10] Gookin called them, “a potent nation in
former times....”[11] In 1620 they numbered perhaps something over
one thousand.[12] The Narragansetts, however, were untouched by the
plague; they are said to have numbered some four thousand.[13]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account