The war and our financial fabricWall, Walter William
History
The war and our financial fabric
Wall, Walter William
Banks and banking -- Great Britain; Currency question -- Great Britain; World War, 1914-1918 -- Economic aspects -- Great Britain
It doesn’t do it, and it couldn’t do it. No such miracle could be done.
This £200 is multiplied greatly. The bank can make that £200 into £1000
or £2000, and actually lend £2000. If I went one day to ask for the
£200, the bank might tell me it could let me have only £10 or £20, and
if I insisted on having the £200, it might have to close its doors and
go into the bankruptcy court.
How is this £200 made into a fund of £2000? Do the sovereigns actually
multiply in the bank’s coffers? Is there a bank fairy that can
make sovereigns out of nothing? No. There is no bank fairy, and no
sovereigns are multiplied. Yet the bank says it has £2000 to lend, and
lends £2000.
That which it lends over and above the original sum of £200 is said
to be the bank’s credit. The bank is said, in the terminology of the
money market, to create credit to this extent. It keeps, say, ten or
twenty sovereigns in its till to provide for the emergencies of a
sudden demand, and lends the rest of the gold and something beyond it.
This something else is called credit. Some people say it is to all
intents and purposes actually money; others declare it is not. And in
discussions on this subject a lot of anger has been wasted and more
vanity wounded.
Anyway, whether we call it money or whether we call it credit, the fact
is indisputable that this is the tangible or intangible something with
which banks benefit the trade and commerce of the nation, and help us
all to become wealthier. This is the so-called money of Lombard Street.
They risk, however, grave dangers, and the community risks grave
dangers in setting up this machinery to facilitate and smooth national
and international commercial dealings. These dangers will be unfolded
gradually in subsequent chapters.
Already it has been hinted where one danger lies.
If of that £200 I place £100 on deposit and £100 on current account
at the bank, the bank has still a total of 200 sovereigns, and can
multiply this sum into £1000 or £2000. But it pays interest then only
on half the sum--the sum on deposit. On the other half it pays no
interest, but it can lend the whole. If I desire to withdraw the £200,
I can by law draw half on demand. The bank, however, can insist on some
days’ notice before allowing me to withdraw the amount on deposit. But
if I insisted on having £100 and the bank had only £20 and could not
get the other £80 quickly, it might have to close its doors. This would
be a run on the bank that might bring it to ruin.
The bank hopes, of course, that I shall not demand my money in a lump
sum at a moment’s notice; that there will be no run. It also hopes that
if I do demand it, it will at once demand the return of its loan, or
part of its loan, from those who have borrowed from it, and thereby get
the two hundred sovereigns it owes to me. It will then be in a position
of having still on loan money, or credit, based apparently on no gold.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account