The war and our financial fabricWall, Walter William
History
The war and our financial fabric
Wall, Walter William
Banks and banking -- Great Britain; Currency question -- Great Britain; World War, 1914-1918 -- Economic aspects -- Great Britain
If, then, when we speak of gold reserves, we are conscious of their
relation to something, what is this something? Is it their relation to
the nation’s commerce as a whole, the nation’s needs as a whole, or
merely the restricted relationship to bank liabilities? What critics
mean is the relation between them and the bank liabilities. But banks
are units of a system. They are not a whole in the same sense as the
Bank of England is. They are independent entities. There are large
banks and small banks and medium-sized banks, and they have liabilities
corresponding to their size. Must the small bank have in its safes
exactly the same _quantity_ of gold as the large bank, irrespective of
its liabilities? Or must the small bank have, not the same quantity,
but the same _proportion_? Or are we to aggregate all the liabilities
of the banks of the kingdom and all their gold reserves and say whether
or not the total quantity of gold is sufficient or insufficient? Even
then we must ask: Sufficient for what? Sufficient to meet the total
liabilities in a time of crisis? This is what we mean. We mean a ratio,
a hypothetical ratio that is to save us from disaster.
Now this ratio is constantly fluctuating. It is fluctuating hour by
hour, day by day, week by week, month by month, and year by year. It
is impossible to keep it rigid. The critics know this, and they say
that only an approximate ratio is wanted. But as we can never foretell,
never pre-calculate what an approximate crisis will be, an approximate
panic, or an approximate run, an approximate ratio may not save us. If
mathematics alone will save us, and not common sense, then we must have
mathematical precision, seeing that we are dealing with figures, not
brains and temperaments.
The only way to keep up an approximate ratio is, not to buy gold, as
many advocate, and hoard it, but to stop lending, to call in loans,
and so raise the ratio figure. Then we can have a relative high gold
reserve. We are speaking, of course, in an ideal sense, for there can
be no simultaneous precision in these movements amongst a number of
independent banks, whose business varies hour by hour.
However, in order to maintain their high ratio banks must cease to
lend when this ratio threatens to fall. It is useless buying several
millions worth of gold--if it could be bought--only to lend more upon
it, increase the liabilities and not alter the habitual proportion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account