The war and our financial fabricWall, Walter William
History
The war and our financial fabric
Wall, Walter William
Banks and banking -- Great Britain; Currency question -- Great Britain; World War, 1914-1918 -- Economic aspects -- Great Britain
Scarce things, therefore, were just as much prized by primitive
people as they are prized by civilized people to-day. It was these
scarce things, therefore, that could be exchanged for an abundance of
things, because no one valued what could easily be got and what all
could have. There was a time when iron was scarce. As iron, too, was
most useful for a great variety of purposes and as its utility was
constantly showing itself, its scarcity, added to its usefulness, made
it increasingly prized and valued. A ring of iron for a crown was of
greater worth once than are the diamond-studded crowns of present day
monarchs, and iron was at one time scarcer than diamonds and rubies
are now, and a man in possession of a little iron could exchange that
possession for a great quantity of cattle with the man who had more
cattle than he knew what to do with. Cattle, therefore, were what we
call cheap and iron was dear, the primitive idea being, as it still is,
that cheapness consists in much and dearness in little, irrespective of
their values in preserving life.
Iron was dear because it was scarce, cattle were cheap because they
were plentiful. But man cannot live by iron, though he can live on
cattle. Judged, therefore, from the standpoint of life-preservation,
cattle should be more precious than iron; but judged from the
standpoint of envy and vanity, iron was, as gold now is, of greater
value than cattle. The one preserves life, the other pride, and here we
see some components of the foundation on which the economic fabric has
been reared.
A savage with a little iron and no live stock was considered wealthier
and more enviable than the man with no iron and a vast quantity of
live stock. The man in possession of the iron knew that he could get
as much live stock as he wanted by parting with all or only a portion
of his iron, and when he exchanged a portion of his iron for cattle he
actually parted with money. The iron and the cattle were money--the
iron was the sovereign and the cattle the pence in those days.
Now, the iron being scarce and being highly valued by the community
on whose land it was found, a greater value was conferred upon it in
time by law. The king and his counsellors of those days enacted that
a certain quantity of iron should discharge so much taxes or redeem
so much debt, that the Government would accept it in payment of taxes
and in liquidation of debt, thereby absolving the payer from all
legal responsibilities and penalties. From being merely an instrument
of custom iron was raised to the higher function of being a legal
instrument. It was given a certain arbitrary value, the value being
expressed in the amount of taxes it should represent and in the amount
of debt it should legally discharge.
Great importance lies in the conception that the legal, apart from the
custom value, was purely arbitrary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account