The war myth in United States history — John Shaqi
The war myth in United States historyHamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
History
The war myth in United States history
Hamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
Propaganda, American; United States -- History; War
There are many facts regarding our conduct during the Revolution
which are not pleasant to relate. For example, on June 1, 1775,
Congress passed a resolution disclaiming any intention of invading
Canada. The report of this decision was widely circulated in Canada.
About four weeks later Congress secretly made plans for the invasion
of Canada that fall. The invasion took place in September, 1775, but
Canada drove the invaders back. (See Lecky, "The American
Revolution," page 215.) Is there any difference between our invasion
of Canada and the German invasion of Belgium? Many people suspected
of being Tories were terribly badly treated. The New York
legislature passed a resolution that Tories should be "deemed guilty
of treason and should suffer death." They were often hunted by mobs,
tarred and feathered, and killed. American troops set fire to the
houses of the people to plunder and rob. In fact in some sections
the colonists looked upon the British army with as much favor as the
American army. New York alone confiscated $3,600,000 worth of
property belonging to Tories, and all the states did likewise.
During that entire period the Tories were the great sufferers. It is
obvious that a person had as much legal and moral right to be a Tory
as to be a Whig, provided he committed no act of violence against
society, and the great majority of Tories had committed none. It was
simply a question of difference in opinion. To punish a person for a
difference of opinion cannot of course be harmonized with
democracy,--majority rule does not mean coercion of minorities.
Dictatorship of the majority can be the worst kind of despotism.
When Great Britain recognized the independence of the colonies in
1783, one provision of the treaty agreed to by both parties was that
the Tories should be compensated by the states for the property
confiscated during the conflict. The states, however, did nothing
about it, but treated that provision as a "scrap of paper."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account