The war myth in United States historyHamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
History
The war myth in United States history
Hamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
Propaganda, American; United States -- History; War
In this war in Cuba between insurgents or rebels and Spanish
authority, both sides destroyed all the property possible, although
the insurgents destroyed more than the Spanish authorities. It was
not nearly so destructive as our Civil War, yet what should we have
thought had Spain protested against the conditions of our Civil War?
Such a protest would have been treated with contempt. We had no more
legal ground for questioning Spanish authority in Cuba, than Japan
today would have in questioning or protesting against our policy in
the Philippines. In fact, two years later, in our guerrilla warfare
with the natives of the Philippines, we adopted the same
concentration policy, as we shall see, against which we then
protested in Cuba.
William Randolph Hearst, who was then the leader of American yellow
journalism, had at this time developed his chain of newspapers from
California to Boston. Early in 1897, he began advocating
intervention. Appeals were made daily. Stories, crimes, and
conditions were pictured in his papers and greatly exaggerated. Mr.
McKinley, opposed to intervention, became President on March 4, 1897.
Mark Hanna who had elected Mr. McKinley President, now wished to be
compensated by an appointment to the United States Senate from Ohio.
To create a vacancy in the Senate, Mr. McKinley appointed as his
Secretary of State Mr. John Sherman who was then Senator from Ohio,
and Mr. Hanna was appointed by the Governor of Ohio to the United
States Senate. Mr. McKinley's appointment of John Sherman as
Secretary of State was a great blunder. Mr. Sherman was then very
old and rapidly declining. His work was left in the hands of his
assistants in the Department of State.
United States citizens owned wealth in Cuba, to the amount of
$50,000,000 and our commerce with Cuba amounted to $100,000,000
annually. These interests, of course, demanded intervention. Our
Department of State in its correspondence with Spain estimated that
$16,000,000 worth of American property had been destroyed in Cuba at
the close of 1897, for which property Spain was held responsible.
This was a greatly exaggerated figure, for at the close of the war a
claims commission was created by Congress to investigate those
claims, and this commission recognized as valid claims amounting to
only about $362,252.
In October, 1897, Spain recalled Governor-General Weyler, and
appointed in his place Blanco. The concentration order was revoked.
Spain offered the natives a larger share of self-government, with
their own constitution and legislature. Autonomy was granted. If it
had been offered three years before, this would, no doubt, have
solved the problem. But now it was difficult to reconcile the two
factions in Cuba. The native Spaniards in Cuba opposed home rule, as
it would give the Cubans too much power. The Cubans wanted
independence, and were unwilling to co-operate with the Spaniards in
home rule. A Cuban parliament was called on May 4, 1898.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account