The war myth in United States historyHamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
History
The war myth in United States history
Hamlin, C. H. (Charles Hunter)
Propaganda, American; United States -- History; War
(2) By far the most important cause of the American Revolution was
the effort on the part of George III to enforce the navigation laws
of Great Britain. It was customary then for every mother-country to
regard its colonies as trading posts. The colonies were considered
necessary as the source of raw materials for the home manufacturers
and also as a market for the surplus manufactured goods of the home
country. This economic principle was a phase of mercantilism which
was the dominant economic doctrine of the time. In harmony with this
theory, Great Britain as early as 1651 began passing navigation acts
requiring her colonies to trade only with British merchants. All the
export trade of the colonies had to be sent to Great Britain, and all
their imported goods had to come from Great Britain. In addition,
the ships transporting these goods had to be owned by British
subjects.
This law, however, was openly violated by the colonial merchants.
They traded with the Dutch or with any other foreigners they could.
British officials in America were bribed and co-operated in this
illegal trade. The leading people of New England at this time were
merchants, and it has been estimated that nine-tenths of these
merchants were smugglers. John Hancock, who was to become president
of the First Continental Congress in 1775, was a smuggler on a great
scale, and at one time was sued for $500,000 as a penalty for
smuggling. John Adams was his counsel. (See Simons, "Social Forces
in United States History," pages 61-62.) It was these merchants of
New England and especially of Boston, who were among the leaders in
the Revolution. After the close of the French and Indian War in
1763, English merchants and English business in general had to be
heavily taxed in order to pay the enormous national debt.
Accordingly, pressure was brought to bear on the British government
to have the navigation laws enforced, which would give the English
the colonial trade, thus enabling them to meet more easily the
financial demands of taxation. Efforts were then made by Great
Britain to enforce these navigation laws which had been openly
violated for more than a century. Their legality had never been
questioned. It was the usual policy of all countries of that age in
dealing with their colonies. These navigation laws were no doubt
unwise interferences with trade but their legality was not
questioned, as all modern tariffs are trade barriers, which does not
make their violation legal. Besides, these laws did not entirely
disregard the interests of the colonies. Great Britain gave them a
monopoly of tobacco raising, prohibiting Ireland from raising it.
Bounties or sums of money were often paid by the British Government
to the colonial producers to encourage industry. These bounties were
paid on indigo, tar, pitch, hemp, and many other industries which
Great Britain was attempting to establish in the colonies in order to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account