The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
Thanks to her own enterprise in pushing the war which had culminated
with so much honor to France, and partly also to her skilful handling
of the factions at court, Catherine de Medici was now in enjoyment
of supreme power. The entire weight of the government rested on her
shoulders, there being no longer any other person who controlled public
affairs. The Guises and Châtillon factions were full of animosity
toward one another, for Madame de Guise refused to recognize the
admiral’s acquittal for the murder of her husband;[733] Montmorency
was deeply offended because the young duke of Guise received the
grand-mastership and the gift of the duchy of Châtellerault, and so
feigned to have the gout in order to avoid service before Havre; Condé
was doubly angry at the queen, both because she withheld the promised
lieutenant’s commission and because the daughter of Marshal St. André,
who left a great fortune, was not permitted to marry his son. The
parties were, therefore, in a triangular relation toward one another
and Catherine’s art was bent upon maintaining the balance in order to
hold her own.[734]
The population of the wittiest city in Europe was quick to perceive
the animosities and paradoxes that existed. “The Parisians have three
things to wonder at,” the saying went, “the constable’s beads, the
chancellor’s mass, and the cardinal Châtillon’s red cap. One is ever
mumbling over his beads and his head is ever occupied with other
affairs; the other hears mass daily and is the chief Huguenot in
France; the third wears a cardinal’s cap and defies the Pope.”[735] The
queen mother had hoped that religious animosities would be forgotten
in the course of the war with England. But she was disappointed. The
peace of Amboise could not be enforced. Even in Paris armed troops
and armed guards had to patrol the streets to prevent outbreaks of
violence.[736] It was impossible to disarm the Catholics, who made
house-to-house searches to ferret out Huguenots.[737] Under the terms
of pacification the Protestants were permitted to return to Paris,
but who dared avail himself of so precarious a liberty? Instead, they
were compelled to sacrifice their property.[738] In the provinces the
same condition of things prevailed—in Languedoc, in the Orléannais,
in the Lyonnais.[739] In Languedoc the association of the Huguenots
maintained its organization, raised money, levied troops.[740] Yet in
spite of its failure to enforce pacification, the government required
the demolition of the walls of towns known to be Huguenot strongholds,
as Orleans, Montauban, and St. Lô, a procedure which the Protestants
strongly resisted; so that a condition of petty civil war existed
throughout much of France, the Edict of Amboise notwithstanding.[741]
Summarized, the troubles of France at this time may be said to have
been the feud between the house of Guise and that of Châtillon—a feud
which compromised the crown and most of the other great families of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account