The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
any one of what religion soever, should offer to invade or assault
them, or raise any commotion in the state, that they might with one
accord unite, and expose their lives in their common defence.” The
Duke of Montpensier was of the same opinion, and several others saying
that they could not choose but so much the more secure the peace of
the Kingdom, when it should be known that all the Nobility were thus
united for the defence of the Crown.
The Queen then did me the honor to command me to speak; whereupon
I began, and said, “That the League proposed could be no ways
prejudicial to the King, being that it tended to a good end for his
Majesty’s service, the good of his Kingdom, and the peace and security
of his People; but that one which should be formed in private could
produce nothing but disorder and mischief; for the good could not
answer for the evil disposed; and should the cards once be shuffled
betwixt League and League, it would be a hard matter to make of it a
good game; that being the most infallible way to open a door to let
strangers into the kingdom, and to expose all things to spoil and
ruin; but that all of us in general, both Princes and others, ought to
make an Association, which should bear the title of the League, or
the Confederation of the King, and to take a great and solemn oath,
not to decline or swerve from it upon penalty of being declared such
as the oath should import; and that his Majesty having so concluded,
ought to dispatch messengers to all parts of the kingdom, with
commission to take the oaths of such as were not there present, by
which means it would be known, who were willing to live and die in
the service of the king and state. And should anyone be so foolish
or impudent as to offer to take arms, let us all swear to fall upon
them; I warrant your Majesty I will take such order in these parts,
that nothing shall stir to the prejudice of your royal authority.
And in like manner let us engage by the faith we owe to God, that if
any Counter-League shall disclose itself, we will give your Majesty
immediate notice of it; and let your Majesty’s be subscribed by all
the great men of your kingdom. The feast will not be right without
them, and they also are easy to be persuaded to it, and the fittest to
provide against any inconvenience that may happen.”
This was my proposition, upon which several disputes ensued; but in
the end the King’s Association was concluded on, and it was agreed,
that all the Princes, great Lords, Governors of Provinces, and
Captains of Gens d’armes should renounce all Leagues and Confederacies
whatsoever, as well without as within the Kingdom, excepting that of
the King, and should take the oath upon pain of being declared rebels
to the crown; to which there were also other obligations added, which
I do not remember.... In the end all was past and concluded, and the
Princes began to take the oath, and to sign the articles.[907]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account