The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
It is necessary to picture the state of France at this time. The
French were not essentially an industrial or commercial nation in the
sixteenth century. France had almost no maritime power and its external
commerce was not great. The great majority of the French people was
composed of peasants, small proprietors, artisans, and officials.
If we analyze city society, we find first some artisans and small
merchants—the bourgeois and the _gens-de-robe_ forming the upper
class. The towns had long since ceased to govern themselves. Society
was aristocratic and controlled by the clergy and nobility. The upper
clergy was very rich. High prelates were all grand seigneurs, while the
lower clergy was very dependent. Monks abounded in the towns, and the
curates possessed a certain influence. The most powerful class was the
nobles, seigneurs, and gentlemen, who possessed a great portion of the
rural properties, and still had fortified castles. They were wholly
employed either at court or in war, or held appointments as governors
of provinces and captains of strongholds. The nobles alone constituted
the regular companies of cavalry, that is to say, the dominant element
of the army. This class was therefore of influence in the state and
the most material force in society. The government was an absolute
monarchy. The king was theoretically uncontested master and obeyed
by all; he exercised an arbitrary and uncontrolled power, and could
decide according to his pleasure, with reference to taxes, laws, and
affairs both of the state and of the church, save in matters of faith.
He named and revoked the commissions of all the governors and acted
under the advice of a council composed of the princes of the blood and
favorites. But this absolute authority was still personal. The king
was only obeyed upon condition of giving the orders himself. There was
no conception of an abstract kingship. If the king abandoned the power
to a favorite, the other great personages of the court would refuse
to obey, and declare that the sovereign was a prisoner. Everything
depended upon a single person. No one thought of resisting Francis I
or Henry II because they were men grown at their accession. But after
1559 we find a series of royal infants or an indolent monarch like
Henry III. Then began the famous rivalries between the great nobles,
rivalries out of which were born the political parties of the times, in
which the Guises, the Montmorencys, and the famous Châtillon brothers
figure so prominently.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account