The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
Spain did everything possible to thwart the negotiation. Her ambassador
in the presence of the King’s council inveighed against the plan,
asserting that the kingdom of France was going to ruin, but he was
cautious not to allege any ground but that of religion.[1478] Finally
the counter-practices of the Guises and the Spanish ambassador, partly
by appeals to religious scruples and partly by the means of lavish
promises, overcame Anjou’s hesitation and he flatly refused to consider
the marriage.[1479] The King was furious. “Brother,” he said, “you
should have used some plainness with me in this matter and not leave
me to wade so far to abuse a prince I so much esteem and honour. You
allege conscience to be the cause but I know it is a late pension
offered unto you by the clergy, who would have you still remain here
for a champion of the Catholic faith. I tell you plainly, I will have
no other champion here but myself, and seeing you have such a desire to
remain here on such respects, it behooves me the more narrowly to look
to you; and as for the clergy, seeing they have so great superfluity,
and I so great necessity, the benefices being at my disposition, I will
take a new order; and as for those who make the offer, I will make some
of them shorter by the head.”[1480]
Nevertheless, despite the fact that the cause was a lost one, the
matter was protracted so long that the negotiators of the affair
themselves perceived the humor in it. Elizabeth protested that “of
herself she had no mind thereto, yet the continual crying unto her
of her Privy Council, the necessity of the time, and the love of her
subjects, had turned her mind to marriage,” while the duke of Anjou
reasserted his belief in his future damnation if he yielded anything
in the matter of religion. Smith, the English envoy, solemnly averred
that “the matter of religion would be the most honourable to break off
with,” both for his mistress and the duke, and in the same breath asked
whether it would suffice if the duke were suffered for a time to have
his mass private in some little oratory or chapel—this so that there
should be no scandal to any of the Queen’s subjects. The queen mother
replied that the duke must have the exercise of his religion open, lest
he should seem to be ashamed of it, and that he was now of late so
devout that he heard two or three masses every day, and fasted the Lent
and vigils so precisely “that he began to be lean and evil-coloured,”
so that she was angry with him and told him that she “had rather he
were an Huguenot than be so foolishly precise to hurt his health.” She
told the English ambassador that he would not be content to have his
mass in a corner, but insisted upon “high mass and all the ceremonies
thereof according to the time, and in song after all solemn fashion
of the Roman church, and a church or chapel appointed where he might
openly have his priests and singers and use all their ceremonies.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account