The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
It is a significant fact that the war has now lost almost all
confessional character and become a factional conflict between the
rival houses of Guise and Montmorency. Catholicism and political
corruption on the one hand were opposed to administrative reform and
religious toleration. After the creation of the Politique party, the
Huguenots of state had merged with them. Except in the case of radical
Calvinists and bigoted Catholics, religion had become a minor issue
with the French unless it were artificially exaggerated.[1681] It was
a mortal enmity on either side, and one which there was slight hope of
settling. The hostility of the Guises and the Montmorencys was the real
seed of the civil war.[1682] It depended upon the individual in almost
every case whether his participation one way or the other was motived
by convictions as to the public good or by private interests. The
number of those who directly or indirectly were attached to the warring
houses almost divided the realm between them and the wretched people
were badly treated by both parties.[1683] So widespread and deep rooted
was this mutual enmity throughout France, that the Venetian ambassador,
no mean observer, wondered when it would end, because it was to the
interest of each to sustain it. The King was a shuttlecock in this
game of political battledore. The ruin of the crown, instead of being
feared by them, was regarded as a possible way to give their enmity
freer rein. Each party counted not only upon paying its debts, which
were enormous, by victory, but in establishing the power of its house
more permanently than ever for the future. While the war cost the King
and the country _écus par milliers_, it cost them nothing, at least of
their own. The weakness of the crown was the strength of the rivals.
They fattened on war, for peace deprived them of their authority, their
power, and their partisans. Until one or the other faction was crushed,
the hostility was certain to endure, and thus the war seemed doomed to
last indefinitely. If, as the result of fatigue or a truce, a respite
was made, the time was brief, and was terminated as soon as one or the
other side had accumulated some substance again. The only remedy for
such a state of affairs was to be found in a foreign war, either in
Flanders or Italy.[1684]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account