The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
Henry III at first had pretended to make light of the escape of his
cousin. But the presence of Henry of Navarre in the field soon had
an important influence. It was the one thing needful to complete the
organization of the Huguenots, many of whom looked upon the prince of
Condé more as a Politique than as one of them. The harmonious working
of the two parties opposed to the crown was now possible in greater
degree than before. Henry of Navarre, the prince of Condé, the duke
of Alençon, and Damville united, were in a position to bring things
to a focus. The actual territory controlled by Henry III at this time
was little, if any, greater than the ancient Ile-de-France, Burgundy,
and Champagne of his ancestors in the twelfth century. The Huguenots
and Politiques so divided the realm among themselves that a map of
the kingdom at this time reminds one of that of France in the feudal
age. Henry of Navarre had made his headquarters at Saumur and thus
was able easily to control Anjou; the allegiance of Guyenne, Béarn,
and Poitou was certain; the duke of Alençon was in occupation of
the “midlands”—Berry (except Bourges) and most of Bourbonnais and
Nivernais. Young Coligny, who had succeeded Montbrun, was in Dauphiné,
and his fealty to the religion was unswerving; Damville and his
lieutenants controlled all Languedoc, Provence, and Auvergne; young
Montgomery was in Lower Normandy where English assistance secretly
helped him, while the prince of Condé, backed by the count palatine,
endangered Picardy.
The winning cards were all in the hands of the Huguenots and the
Politiques. Without territory, without funds, with an unpaid army or
hireling mercenaries only, the crown had no other recourse than to
accept the situation and make peace unless Henry III and the queen
mother stooped to the worse humiliation of receiving the support of
Philip II. And so it came to pass that while Paris daily expected to
withstand a siege and the faubourgs and gates were so crowded with
those living outside the walls and refugees from the environs “that
a man could scarce enter the gates for the people, carriages, and
cattle,”[1737] Henry III signed the Act of Peace, May 2, 1576.
The peace of 1576, sometimes called the Peace of Monsieur, from the
duke of Alençon’s prominent part in its formation, was the most
complete and elaborate charter yet given the Huguenots, embodying
the wisdom that experience had taught. It is to be noticed that the
settlement involved both toleration of the religion and political
reform. The provisions of this composite peace may be classified
under four heads, each of which was an essential element in the late
opposition to the crown, viz:—the Huguenots, Henry of Navarre, the
duke of Alençon, the Politiques.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account