The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
Having so far required everything that could conceivably be based
upon things present, Henry endeavored to revive the ancient claims of
his house in a startling fashion. The old feudal spirit of William
of Aquitaine and Raymond of Toulouse seems to have been reincarnated
in his person at this time. For Henry demanded further that he be
recompensed for the 6,000 livres promised in time past, in virtue of
the right that Françoise de Bretagne, wife of Aleyne, sieur d’Albret,
father of John of Navarre, had had to the duchy of Brittany.[1740] But
even this was not all, for Henry of Navarre finally made the demand
that the pension of 46,000 livres which his grandfather had enjoyed in
recompense for the loss of Navarre, from which his great grandfather
had been expelled in 1512 by Ferdinand of Aragon, be continued to him,
and _that the King of France should promise to help him to recover
Navarre!_[1741]
In the nature of things, not a tithe of these demands could be granted
by the crown, least of all the last. The massacre of St. Bartholomew
had proved how perilous it was to try to drive Catholic France into a
war with Spain, and France was less ready now than in 1570-72 to join
battle with Philip. Perforce Henry of Navarre had to be content with a
restoration of things as they were on August 24, 1572.[1742]
The duke of Alençon had created for him a position stronger than that
of Henry of Navarre. As a prince of the blood and as a Politique
he occupied middle ground between the crown and the Huguenots;
in consequence, many of the places which neither of the chief
principals was willing to resign were included in the grant to him.
While technically all the territories so concerned were regarded
as appanages,[1743] it is plain that a distinction may easily be
made between the duchies of Alençon, Maine, Anjou, Touraine, and
La Roche—which had originally been given him as a prince of the
blood—and places like Bourges, Moulins, Loches, Saumur, La Charité,
Pont-de-Sel, Amiens, Moulans, and Mantes. These latter possessions were
practically a class apart of security cities intrusted by compromise to
the duke. This was particularly true of Saumur and La Charité, which
insured the Protestants of passage across the lower and upper Loire,
and so linked the South with Normandy on the North and the Palatinate
and the German Protestant states to the east. Moreover, Moulins in
Bourbonnais and Bourges in Berry assured the Protestants of position
there, so that the whole left bank of the Loire from Auvergne to Nantes
was in their control. Mantes was meant to compensate the Huguenots in
the vicinity of Paris for the loss of Charenton.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account