The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip IIThompson, James Westfall
History
The Wars of Religion in France 1559-1576: The Huguenots, Catherine de Medici and Philip II
Thompson, James Westfall
France -- History -- Wars of the Huguenots, 1562-1598; Sainte Ligue (1576-1593)
to counter the coalition of Catherine de Medici and the constable
by overtures to Antoine of Navarre, whose own pliant nature readily
yielded to their blandishments, telling him that Philip II probably
would be inclined to restore his lost kingdom of Navarre or give him
an equivalent in Sardinia, in the event of the adoption of a strong
Catholic policy on his part.[279]
Catherine de Medici, however, by the promptness of her action, and
perhaps not a little owing to the unpopularity of the cardinal of
Lorraine,[280] got the better of the Guises, the government being
organized around the queen mother and the three Bourbon princes, the
king of Navarre, the cardinal of Bourbon, the prince of Condé the
constable, the three Châtillons—the admiral Coligny, the cardinal
Odet, and D’Andelot—the duke de Montpensier and the prince de la
Roche-sur-Yon.[281] The duke of Aumale, the marquis of Elbœuf, the
grand prior of France, and the cardinals of Lorraine and Guise, all
brothers of the duke of Guise and the cardinal of Lorraine left the
court at the same time,[282] but if the pride of the Guises was
wounded, they did not show it. They were followed by all the companies
of ordinance, both cavalry and infantry, which had been sent to Orleans.
But Catherine de Medici looked farther than the present order of things
and schemed to have the coronation effected as soon as possible,
thinking that it would remove many difficulties alleged of the King’s
minority[283] and make him of sufficient authority to appoint such
governors as he pleased.[284] She found means to have it arranged in
the Privy Council (March 27, 1561) that she and the king of Navarre,
in the capacity of lieutenant-general, should rule jointly, the King’s
seal being in the custody of both and kept in a coffer to which each
should carry a different key. This astute move gave Catherine exclusive
guardianship of the person of Charles IX, and assured her at least an
equal power in the regency.[285] At the same time orders were given
for the ambassadors and others who wished for audience to ask it of
the queen mother through the secretaries.[286] By this new arrangement
it became unnecessary to give account of one’s business first of all
either to the cardinal of Lorraine or the constable, or to anyone else,
as was usually done before; but at once to address the queen, who,
should the matter need to be referred to the council, could propose
it and give reply according to their decision. As not one of these
councilors was superior to another, the power was all in Catherine’s
hands. She had played her cards well and had won. The duke of Guise
ceased to be of influence at court and the constable “was satisfied to
lose his authority in order to damage his enemies.”[287] France began
to awaken to the fact that the queen who had led a life of retirement
during her husband’s reign, in that of her son was evincing that
capacity for public affairs which was an hereditary possession in her
family.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account