The Wars of the Roses; or, Stories of the Struggle of York and LancasterEdgar, John G. (John George)
History
The Wars of the Roses; or, Stories of the Struggle of York and Lancaster
Edgar, John G. (John George)
Great Britain -- History -- Wars of the Roses, 1455-1485
Warwick was suspected to be the author of this disturbance.
Nevertheless, the king found it necessary to treat the earl and
Clarence as if he entertained no suspicion. He even intrusted them with
the command of forces destined to suppress the insurgents, while he
prepared to march against them with a numerous army.
Meanwhile, the king sent for Lord Welles, father of Sir Robert, and,
at the royal summons, that nobleman came to Westminster, in company
with Sir Thomas Dymoke, who had married his daughter. Being informed,
however, that the king was much incensed, the Lancastrian lord and
his son-in-law deemed it prudent to repair to the sanctuary. Edward,
however, plighted his word as a prince, that he intended no harm,
and they, fully relying on a pledge so sacred, came to his presence.
Edward, thereupon, commanded Lord Welles to write to his son to desist
from his enterprise; but Sir Robert continuing firm in spite of the
paternal admonition, Edward caused both the old lord and his son-in-law
to be executed.
After this faithless proceeding Edward left London. Marching against
the insurgents, he came up with them on the 13th of March, at
Erpingham, in the county of Rutland. The royal army was so superior in
number that Sir Robert had scarcely a chance of victory. Exasperated,
however, by the execution of his father, the brave knight, setting
prudence at defiance, was eager for an encounter. The armies joined
battle, and it soon appeared that Sir Robert had reckoned without his
host. The conflict was utterly unequal; and, the insurgents having
been worsted, their leader was taken prisoner. No sooner was Welles in
the hands of the enemy than the Lincolnshire men whom he had commanded
became a mob, and fled from the field, having previously thrown off
their coats, that their running might not be impeded. From this
circumstance the battle was popularly spoken of as "Losecote Field."
The tables were now turned. The king was in a condition to defy
Warwick, while the king-maker had no means of raising such a force
as could, with any chance of success, encounter the royal army
flushed with victory. The earl, however, made one effort. Being at
his Castle of Warwick, and hearing of Edward's victory at Erpingham,
he endeavored to draw Lord Stanley, his brother-in-law, to his side.
Stanley, however, was far too prudent a man to rush into danger even
for his great kinsman's sake. He answered that "he would never make war
against King Edward;" and Warwick and Clarence were compelled to turn
toward Dartmouth.
CHAPTER XXII.
THE SIEGE OF EXETER.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account