Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821 -- Elba and the Hundred Days, 1814-1815; Waterloo, Battle of, Waterloo, Belgium, 1815
The Editor of an Article in _The Quarterly Review_, No. CLI., entitled
_Marmont_, _Siborne_, and _Alison_, having, in his comments upon this
Work, denied the accuracy of one or two important facts therein stated;
I have, in notes at pages 57 and 152,[2] entered into more minute
details, which explain the grounds that warrant me in adhering to the
original statements.
The observations made in the Preface of a Volume of "MURRAY's Home
and Colonial Library," entitled _The Story of Waterloo_, and the
palpable embodiment of the present Work into the pages of the latter,
have been such as could scarcely fail to attract attention; and I
have accordingly appended to this Edition, in a separate form, some
remarks upon that publication.[3] Public opinion (if I may judge by the
unanimous consent of the press) having so distinctly pronounced its
acknowledgment of the value of my Work, as one of History; I could not
disregard the conduct of a Writer, who, in the first place endeavours
to depreciate that value, and then unblushingly makes the most ample
and unlicensed use of it for his own purposes.
W. SIBORNE.
_18th June 1848._
[Illustration: THE DUKE OF WELLINGTON.]
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 1: _Omitted in this Fourth Edition.--E.A._]
[Footnote 2: Omitted in this Fourth Edition.--E.A.]
[Footnote 3: Omitted in this Fourth Edition.--E.A.]
PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION.
The circumstance of the First Edition having been sold off within a
very few days, combined with the highly favourable notices taken of the
Work by professional as well as other critics, and, I may be permitted
to add, the very flattering encomiums which have been pronounced upon
it by so many who, from their position, are the most competent to
form an opinion on its merits, cannot fail to afford proofs, the most
satisfactory to the Public, and, at the same time, the most gratifying
to the Author, that, in the production of these Volumes,[4] upon a
subject of such stirring national interest, neither the expectations of
the former have been altogether disappointed, nor the labours of the
latter bestowed in vain.
The present Edition contains corrections on one or two points of
trivial importance, to which my attention has been directed; and I
shall be happy to receive further information from surviving Eye
Witnesses who may discover any instances in which the facts related
appear either inaccurately or insufficiently explained.
W. SIBORNE.
_August 23rd, 1844._
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 4: The First and Second Editions of this Work were each
published in Two Volumes.--E.A.]
PREFACE.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account