The Way of Initiation; or, How to Attain Knowledge of the Higher WorldsSteiner, Rudolf
Religion
The Way of Initiation; or, How to Attain Knowledge of the Higher Worlds
Steiner, Rudolf
Theosophy
He began, then, to study eagerly the _History of Natural Creation_. In
it Haeckel gives a fascinating picture of the evolution of species,
from the amoeba to man. In it he shows the successive growth of organs,
and the physiological process by which living beings have raised
themselves to organisms more and more complex and more and more
perfect. But in this stupendous transformation, which implies millions
and millions of years, he never explains the initial force of this
universal ascent, nor the series of special impulses which cause beings
to rise step by step. To these primordial questions, Haeckel has never
been able to reply except by admitting spontaneous generation,[2] which
is tantamount to a miracle as great as the creation of man by God from
a clod of earth. To a theosophist like Steiner, on the other hand, the
cosmic force which elaborates the world comprises in its spheres,
fitted one into another, the myriads of souls which crystallize and
incarnate ceaselessly in all beings. He, who saw the _underside_ of
creation, could but recognize and admire the extent of the all-round
gaze with which Haeckel surveyed his _above_. It was in vain that the
naturalist would deny the divine Author of the universal scheme: he
proved it in spite of himself, in so well describing His work. As to
the theosophist, he greeted, in the surging of species and in the
breath which urges them onward--Man in the making, the very thought of
God, the visible expression of the planetary Word.[3]
[2] A speech delivered in Paris, 28th August 1878. See also
Haeckel's _History of Natural Creation_, 13th lecture.
[3] This is how Dr. Steiner himself describes the famous
German naturalist: "Haeckel's personality is captivating. It
is the most complete contrast to the _tone_ of his writings.
If Haeckel had but made a slight study of the philosophy of
which he speaks, not even as a dilettante, but like a child,
he would have drawn the most lofty spiritual conclusions from
his phylogenetic studies. Haeckel's doctrine is grand, but
Haeckel himself is the worst of commentators on his doctrine.
It is not by showing our contemporaries the weak points in
Haeckel's doctrine that we can promote intellectual progress,
but by pointing out to them the grandeur of his phylogenetic
thought." Steiner has developed these ideas in two works:
_Welt und Lebensanschauungen im 19ten Jahrhundert_ (Theories
of the Universe and of Life in the Nineteenth Century), and
_Haeckel und seine Gegner_ (Haeckel and his Opponents).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account