The Way to Abolish SlaveryStearns, Charles (Abolitionist)
Religion
The Way to Abolish Slavery
Stearns, Charles (Abolitionist)
Slavery -- United States
Our enquiry is not what the Constitution can be made to mean, but what
is the natural and fair import of its language? Of course, we can
pervert the meaning of any instrument, and by false reasoning and wordy
controversy, make black appear white, and _vice versa_. When I say
"John, come to dinner," to a fair, impartial listener, my meaning would
appear plain; but to a technical quibbler, I might be made to be a great
tyrant. For instance, I assert authority. I utter a command. I do not
ask John to come to dinner, but I require him to come, and a long
argument might be entered into to prove my tyrannical nature, such as
that I was forcing John to eat whether he wished to or not; that I
required him to eat a good deal, a dinner, instead of a little, and
above all, that I was disposed to force him to _obey me_. By such
reasoning, the kindest of parents might be proved to be severe and
hardhearted. On the contrary, if I say "dinner is ready, John," the same
quibbler might accuse me of indifference to my child's welfare, that I
did not care whether he came or not, and so on.
Now in all these cases, that sterling quality, common sense, is to be
brought into requisition. When I promise to carry my friend to ride
to-morrow, unforeseen accidents are of course considered as an excuse
for the non-fulfilment of my promise; but Mr. Lysander Spooner, in
behalf of my friend, might enter an action in law against me; for there
are my words in writing, "I will take you to ride to-morrow;" but common
sense would excuse me, if my horse should be sick, or my carriage be
stolen. Mr. Spooner argues like an earnest man, to prove that these
expressions do not mean Slaves, because they cannot be proved to have
reference to such a class, by the exact meaning of the words. "The word
free is not the correlative of Slavery; for a variety of reasons," he
says. He thinks "all persons" mean aliens. Now, what an absurdity. Who
ever heard of three-fifths of the aliens in each State being added to
the naturalized citizens in making out the apportionment of
representatives? How many representatives have seats in Congress, in
consequence of aliens residing in their districts? Not one, and yet
twenty-five men are seated there, in consequence of Slaves residing in
their districts. It is a burning shame for a man to prostitute such
noble powers of thought as Mr. Spooner possesses, to such a silly and
contemptible mode of reasoning. Why, if his arguments are correct, all
poetry and figures of speech are wrong; all metaphorical language, and
personifications in writing are out of place; and nothing is left us but
plain, straight forward words, which have a precise meaning, and can
mean nothing else. If I say "the wind blows," I lie, for wind is an
action of something else, and, of course, it is absurd to talk of its
blowing. If I say "I am in pain," it is not true, for the pain is in me;
and if I talk of God's moving the world by his arm, it is false, for he
has no arm.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account