“Have the goodness, Timms, just to explain the meaning of your terms,
which are quite new to me. I will not swear they are not in the Code of
Practice, but they are in neither Blackstone nor Kent.”
“Horse-shedding, ’Squire Dunscomb, explains itself. In the country, most
of the jurors, witnesses, &c., have more or less to do with the
horse-sheds, if it’s only to see that their beasts are fed. Well, we
keep proper talkers there, and it must be a knotty case, indeed, into
which an ingenious hand cannot thrust a doubt or an argument. To be
frank with you, I’ve known three pretty difficult suits summed up under
a horse-shed in one day; and twice as many opened.”
“But how is this done?—do you present your arguments directly, as in
court?”
“Lord bless you, no. In court, unless the jury happen to be unusually
excellent, counsel have to pay some little regard to the testimony and
the law; but, in horse-shedding, one has no need of either. A skilful
horse-shedder, for instance, will talk a party to pieces, and not say a
word about the case. That’s the perfection of the business. It’s against
the law, you know, Mr. Dunscomb, to talk of a case before a juror—an
indictable offence—but one may make a case of a party’s general
character, of his means, his miserly qualities, or his aristocracy; and
it will be hard to get hold of the talker for any of them qualities.
Aristocracy, of late years, is a capital argument, and will suit almost
any state of facts, or any action you can bring. Only persuade the jury
that the plaintiff or defendant fancies himself better than they are,
and the verdict is certain. I got a thousand dollars in the Springer
case, solely on that ground. Aristocracy did it! It is going to do us a
great deal of harm in this murder and arson indictment.”
“But Mary Monson is no aristocrat—she is a stranger, and unknown. What
privileges does she enjoy, to render her obnoxious to the charge of
aristocracy?”
“More than will do her any good. Her aristocracy does her almost as much
harm in old Duke’s as the piece of gold. I always consider a cause as
half lost, when there is any aristocracy in it.”
“Aristocracy means exclusive political privileges in the hands of a few;
and it means nothing else. Now, what exclusive political privileges does
this unfortunate young woman enjoy? She is accused of two of the highest
crimes known to the laws; is indicted, imprisoned, and will be tried.”
“Yes, and by her _peers_,” said Timms, taking out a very
respectable-looking box, and helping himself liberally to a pinch of cut
tobacco. “It’s wonderful, ’Squire Dunscomb, how much breadth the
_peerage_ possesses in this country! I saw a trial, a year or two since,
in which one of the highest intellects of the land was one of the
parties, and in which a juror asked the judge to explain the meaning of
the word ‘bereaved.’ _That_ citizen had his rights referred to his
peers, with a vengeance!”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account