It now seems probable that it was after this manner that the sun and
its family of planets were formed. The matter which is contained in
them may have been in the form of a dark, solid body pursuing some
sort of course in space. In its journeying it came near another body
and was awakened into a life of activity in the form of a flat, spiral
nebula which was left spinning around in a pyrotechnic manner, the
matter composing it much diffused at the outer edges and densest in
the center. Scattered through it were the more or less condensed spots
which were the embryonic forms destined to come forth from the parent
body as the individual planets.
When the separation was completed, each planet fed and grew upon all
the matter that it had the force to draw to it, and it swept clean the
space that lay within the limits of its power. If the particles thus
gathered in were small and slow of motion, they became a part of the
body of the planet. If they were large and swift, they became members
of the planet’s family as satellites. In whatever area of the nebula
each planet came into a separate existence, it fed upon the matter
which that area afforded. In the case of Neptune, at the outer edge of
the system, it was very diffuse matter; in Mercury’s region, nearer the
center, it was more dense.
Thus in our family of planets, though its members were born of the same
parent and developed under the same guiding laws, each has a distinct
individuality arising from its inherent qualities and its environment
during the early stages of its existence. The spiral-nebula theory
seems to offer a better explanation of these individual qualities than
any other that has been advanced thus far, and in its main features
it is pretty generally accepted. But one must keep in mind that the
details of any theory of the beginning and growth of the planets are
more or less speculative, or, at least, have not yet been proved with
finality.
V
THE SEVEN GREAT PLANETS
So far as we know, five of the planets--Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter,
and Saturn--have been known from time immemorial. There are existing
records of them made thousands of years ago. There is no reason why
they should not have been thus known, since they have always been as
they are now, visible to the naked eye, and all of them save Mercury
are as easily seen as the sun or the moon. They do not, of course,
exact the instant attention that those great luminaries do, because,
being smaller, they are less isolated from the great body of the stars;
but they are in their seasons plainly visible, and can then always be
seen if one looks at them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account