Mr. Cooper, the parish surgeon, was a special object of antipathy
to the worthy and humane Howarth; he was one of those ridiculously
particular men, unfit to deal with paupers. He actually objected to
the pauper women performing their ablutions in the urinals, and felt
aggrieved when the master told him to "mind his shop," and Howarth
stood by without rebuking the autocrat! Mr. Cooper, too, admits that
the dietary would be sufficient with all the above-mentioned "ifs." But
he finds that the milk porridge contains one quart of milk to six of
oat-meal; that the meat is half fat, and often uneatable from imperfect
cooking; and that the frequent stoppages of diet are destructive of
the health of the younger inmates. His remonstrances, however, have
been received in a style that has read him a lesson, and he ceases to
remonstrate accordingly, and the guardians have it as they would—a
silent surgeon and an omnipotent master.
The saddest part of the farce, however, was that of the last day's
proceedings. The quality and quantity of the diet had been discussed;
the directors felt bound to examine into both; so they proceeded to
the house. Of course the master knew nothing of the intended visit. Who
can suspect the possibility of such a thing after the previous display
of Howarth's impartiality and determination to do justice? So to the
house they went. They took the excellent Lee quite by surprise, and
enjoyed parish pot-luck. Dr. Birmingham's description makes one's mouth
water:—
"He came to the house on Saturday, in order to examine the food;
he found that, on that day, the inmates had what was called
ox-cheek soup; he tasted it, and he was so well satisfied with
it that he took all that was given to him. He then went into the
kitchen, and saw the master cutting up meat for the sick and
infirm. He tasted the mutton, and found it as succulent and as
good as that which he purchased for his own consumption."
The picture of this patriarchal and benevolent master "cutting up meat
for the sick and infirm," is perfectly beautiful. Howarth, too, did his
duty, and was equally lucky.
"Mr. Howarth stated that he had visited the house yesterday, and
had examined the food, with the quality of which he was perfectly
satisfied. He tasted the soup, and was so well pleased with it
that he obtained an allowance. (A laugh.)"
But not satisfied with this, that Rhadamanthus of a Birmingham proposed
a crucial test.
"He begged to move that the master of the workhouse be desired to
bring before the board the ordinary rations allowed the paupers
for breakfast, dinner, and supper; and that any gentleman present
be allowed to call and examine any of the paupers as to whether
the food they usually received was of the same quality, and in
the same quantity."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account