"Mr. Chadwick first referred to the operation of the existing
law upon _unsettled_ labouring men. 'The lower districts of
Reading were severely visited with fever during the last year,
which called attention to the sanitary condition of the labouring
population. I was requested to visit it. While making inquiries
upon the subject, I learned that some of the worst-conditioned
places were occupied by agricultural labourers. Many of them, it
appeared, walked four, six, seven, and even eight miles, in wet
and snow, to and from their places of work, after twelve hours'
work on the farm. Why, however, were agricultural labourers in
these fever-nests of a town? I was informed, in answer, that they
were driven in there by the pulling down of cottages, to avoid
parochial settlements and contributions to their maintenance in
the event of destitution. Among a group, taken as an example
there, in a wretched place consisting of three rooms, ten feet
long, lived Stephen Turner, a wife, and three children. He
walked to and from his place of work about seven miles daily,
expending two hours and a half in walking before he got to his
productive work on the farm. His wages are 10_s._ a week, out
of which he pays 2_s._ for his wretched tenement. If he were
resident on the farm, the two and a half hours of daily labour
spent in walking might be expended in productive work; his labour
would be worth, according to his own account, and I believe to
a farmer's acknowledgment, 2_s._ 6_d._ per week more. For a
rent of £5 5_s._, such as he now pays, he would be entitled
to a good cottage with a garden; and his wife and children
being near, would be available for the farm labour. So far as
I could learn there are between one hundred and two hundred
agricultural labourers living in the borough of Reading, and the
numbers are increasing. The last week brought to my notice a
fact illustrative of the present unjust state of things, so far
as regards the labourer. A man belonging to Maple-Durham lived
in Reading; walked about four miles a day to his work, the same
back, frequently getting wet; took fever, and continued ill some
time, assisted by the Reading Union in his illness; recovered,
and could have returned to his former employment of 10_s._ per
week, but found he was incapable of walking the distance; the
consequence was, he took work that only enabled him to earn 5_s._
per week; he is now again unable to work. Even in Lincolnshire,
where the agriculture is of a high order, and the wages of the
labourer consequently not of the lowest, similar displacements
have been made, to the prejudice of the farmer as well as the
labourer, and, as will be seen, of the owner himself. Near
Gainsborough, Lincoln, and Louth, the labourers walk even longer
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account