"We shall impress the disastrous importance of the reduction in
the number of the people on our readers, by placing before them a
brief account of the previous progress of the population. There
is good reason to suppose, that, prior to the middle of the last
century, the people continually, though slowly, increased; but
from that time something like authentic but imperfect records
give the following as their numbers at successive periods:—
1754 2,372,634
1767 2,544,276 Increase per cent. 7·2
1777 2,690,556 " 5·7
1785 2,845,932 " 5·8
1805 5,359,456 " 84·0
1813 5,937,858 " 10·8
1821 6,801,829 " 14·6
1831 7,767,401 " 14·9
1841 8,175,124 " 5·3
1851 6,515,794 Decrease 20·0
"Though there are some discrepancies in these figures, and
probably the number assigned to 1785 is too small, and that
assigned to 1805 too large, they testify uniformly to a continual
increase of the people for eighty-seven years, from 1754 to 1841.
Now, for the first time in nearly a century, a complete change
has set in, and the population has decreased in the last ten
years 20 per cent. It is 1,659,330 less than in 1841, and less by
286,033 than in 1821.
"But this is not quite all. The census of 1851 was taken 68
days earlier than the census of 1841; and it is obvious, if the
same rate of decrease continued through those 68 days, as has
prevailed on the average through the ten years, that the whole
amount of decrease would be so much greater. Sixty-eight days is
about the 54th part of ten years—say the 50th part; and the 50th
part of the deficiency is 33,000 odd—say 30,000. We must add
30,000, therefore, to the 1,659,330, making 1,689,330, to get the
true amount of the diminution of the people in ten years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account