The Wild IrishmanCrosland, T. W. H. (Thomas William Hodgson)
History
The Wild Irishman
Crosland, T. W. H. (Thomas William Hodgson)
National characteristics, Irish
O’Connor is an Irishman and a Nationalist, but he has
shaken the dust of Ireland from his feet, and he sits for the Scotland
division of Liverpool, and has done himself rather well as a promoter
of heterogeneous newspapers in London. With Mr. O’Connor, however, we
shall deal fully elsewhere. Only for the sake of symmetry, do not let us
forget that he is a pathriot of the finest water. The vital defect in
the character of the Irish pathriot, looking at him squarely, is that
in recent times at any rate he has never been a statesman. A pathriot
with the proper statesmanlike qualities might, it is true, have been
altogether swamped by the frothy eloquence and wild demands of the main
body of pathriots. But such a one, if the Irish could only have managed
to find him and keep him going, whether in the House of Commons or on
English platforms, would in the long run have made a vast difference
to her interests. It may be argued that Ireland did actually find a
statesman in Mr. Gladstone. On the other hand it is abundantly evident
that however sincere and admirable Mr. Gladstone’s proposals for the
betterment of the country may have been, they were not based on anything
like an exact, or for that matter even a working, knowledge of its
necessities and requirements. As for Mr. Parnell, it is no disrespect
to him to say of him, in full view of his amazing career, that he was
not a statesman even in a small way. His aloofness, haughtiness and
chilliness of temper precluded him from a really effective part or lot
in the faction which he led, and ruled with a rod of iron, and, for
himself, he had not sufficient spirits and imagination to carve out an
independent and statesmanlike policy. Mr. Parnell made a great name
and no little dust in the world, yet the verdict of history upon him
will be that he was neither an O’Connell nor an Isaac Butt, and that he
failed to go anything like so far as might have been expected of him.
For the rest of the pathriots, the remnant, as it were, of the National
party, they do not matter, and they know it. In the House of Commons
they are absolutely without other than adventitious power. The English
party system happened to afford them certain mechanical advantages of
which they are never tired of boasting. Their sarcasms and humors and
occasional displays of temper bring them from time to time a passing
notoriety. But taking them as a body they are inept, irresponsible,
feeble and negligible; constituting, indeed, a standing monument to
the undesirable vagaries which might be looked for in the event of
their being granted that much desired “little place of their own” on
College Green. In fine, the Irish pathriot of our own times will not
wash. He means well by his country, and well enough by himself, but he
has no balance, and is entirely blind to the falsehood of extremes. It
is curious to note how easily Ireland is satisfied. In pretty well all
matters that concern her closely her standard of requirement is barely
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account