The Wild IrishmanCrosland, T. W. H. (Thomas William Hodgson)
History
The Wild Irishman
Crosland, T. W. H. (Thomas William Hodgson)
National characteristics, Irish
and where there is a soft job, or obvious pickings, there you will find
a Scotchman. So that throughout Ireland, Scotchmen have been scattered
wherever the Government could find a place for one. There is scarcely
an office, sub-office, or sub-deputy office worth the having in all
Ireland which has not been made the perquisite of a Protestant Scotchman.
Even the Congested Districts Board employs Scotch factors, and Thom’s
Almanac is little more than a catalogue of Scotch patronymics. And the
pride and insolence and unfairness of them! From a booklet called _The
Scot in Ulster_, written by a Scotchman, and published, if you please,
by Blackwood’s of Edinburgh, I take the following: “Their English and
Scotch origin seems to me to give to the men of Ulster an unalienable
right to protest, as far as they are concerned, against the policy of
separation from Great Britain to which the Irish, with the genius for
nicknames which they possess, at present give the name of Home Rule.”
Could sophistry, craft, subtlety, disingenuousness, or the Scotch genius
for cunning misrepresentation go further? To say that when the Irish
people have said Home Rule they meant separation, is to promulgate a
deliberate and wily untruth. The Irish people proper invariably mean
what they say, no more and no less. Home Rule never meant more nor less
to the Irish than “a parliament on college green.” It was the Scotch, and
the Scotch alone, who set up the cry of “separation” for a bugbear and
a bogy wherewith to frighten the timorous English ruler into stubborn
acquiescence in the Scotch view of Irish affairs. Yet here we have a
Scotchman assuring us in cold print that Home Rule is merely an Irish
“nickname” for “separation.” I note with considerable satisfaction,
however, that, as Scotchmen will, the author of _The Scot in Ulster_
proceeds religiously to give away the whole Scotch-Irish question. “For
centuries,” says he, “the Scot had been wont to wander forth over Europe
in search of _adventure_. [The italic is ours.] As a rule, he turned
his steps where fighting was to be had, _and the pay for killing was
reasonably good_. [Again the italics are ours.]… These Scots who have
flocked from Leith, or Crail, or Berwick to seek fortune, in peace or
war, on the Continent of Europe were mostly the young and adventurous,
for whom the old home life had become too narrow. _They took with them
little save their own stout hearts and their national long heads_.
[These, too, are our italics.]… The time arrived at last, however, when
war with England ceased, and internal strife became less bloody, and
Scotland began to be too small for her rapidly growing population, _for
in those days food did not necessarily come where there were mouths
to consume it_. [Italics—of our own—which famine-stricken Ireland may
fittingly ponder.] Then the Scots, true to the race from which they
sprung—for ‘Norman, and Saxon, and Dane are we’ [think of it!][2]—began
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account