The winners in life's race : $b Or, the great backboned familyBuckley, Arabella B. (Arabella Burton)
Science
The winners in life's race : $b Or, the great backboned family
Buckley, Arabella B. (Arabella Burton)
Animals -- Juvenile literature; Vertebrates -- Juvenile literature
It was in the midst of a scene such as this that we first find the
feeble ancestors of the Sturgeon and the Shark beginning to make their
way in the world. It may be that creatures such as the sea-squirts,
the lancelet, and the lamprey, were there to bear them company, but
these soft animals could leave no trace behind except the tiny teeth
of the lampreys; for they had no enamelled plates like the plated
fish, no hard teeth-spines like the sharks, which could become buried
in the soft mud when they died, and remain, together with the hard
shell of their enemy the Pterygotus, to be dug out now in our day and
bear witness to the fight they fought. But the plated-scaled fish
had something to leave behind, and from their remains we can picture
to ourselves a group of clumsy fish scarcely a foot long, with hind
fins like paddles and single-fringe fins on their back, with enamelled
lozenge-shaped plates on their bodies and unevenly pointed tails.
These fish would keep well out of the way of the Pterygotus, because
they were small and weak and he was large and strong. We may imagine
them gliding among the seaweeds, and hugging the shore as they chewed
the plants with their flat-ridged teeth, for their skeletons were
probably feeble and their armour-like shields were heavy, and they
would not be so active as the little shark-like animals, not bigger
than a half-pound perch, with tough skins and sharp spines, which swam
more boldly out to sea. These more active fish were the founders of
the shark group, and those sharp spines, together sometimes with the
tough skin, remained buried in the mud, and have come down to us as
fossils.[22]
We should find it difficult to say exactly to what class all these
early fish belonged, for there were very few kinds, and therefore fewer
distinctions, between them in those days; and many peculiarities which
afterwards appear in different groups either did not exist or were
united in one fish. It is enough for us that they were the ancestors
of our sharks and sturgeons and mud-fish of to-day; and though they
were but small and weak, yet they were the beginning of a powerful race
of creatures, for they had the great advantage of a growing inside
skeleton, which could vary and strengthen with their bodies from
generation to generation, while their rivals, the Pterygotus and his
companions, had only their heavy cumbrous armour with a mass of soft
flesh inside, and were but lumbering creatures at best.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account