The Witchcraft Delusion in New England: Its Rise, Progress, and Termination (Vol. 2 of 3)Mather, Cotton
History
The Witchcraft Delusion in New England: Its Rise, Progress, and Termination (Vol. 2 of 3)
Mather, Cotton
Witchcraft -- New England
this (being cleared from the Ambiguity you express it in) maketh to the
purpose I know not, unless God had promised for a determinate time to
detain them under this restraint. I do not understand what you intend
by the dead being raised by Holy Men; the most natural inference is,
that in imitation of them wicked men by their Inchantments calling on
a _Dæmon_ to appear in the shape of the dead, will pretend that they
also can raise the dead. The _Romanists_ are much obliged to you for
making Transubstantiation (so much contended for by them) to be of as
old a date as the appearance of Devils, and that the one implieth no
more contradiction than the other: If so we do well to think seriously
whether we are not guilty of great sin in separating from them; for
certainly whatever private Mens Notions in this Age may be, yet it is
matter of great moment, that all Antiquity (the _Saducees_ the Elder
Brethren of our Hobbists[98] excepted) hath believed the appearance
of Evil Spirits and their Illusions. I should be too officious if
I offered to explain, how matter, real matter may fall under the
cognisance of one of our senses, and not the rest. It is for you to
shew the impossibility thereof, if you will build any thing upon your
Assertion, to prove which your first Argument is (it seems to me) a
Chimera, which [85] is not enough, when there are many to whom it seems
to be a truth: Your second is very dangerous, and highly derogatory of
the honour of God, between whom and the Devil you make comparison more
than once as the power of the Almighty must not be confined to be less
than the Devils. And again, to deny these three last were to make the
Devil an Independent Power and consequently a God. These expressions
(which cannot but be very pleasing to the Devil, who vainly boasts
himself to be a Being without dependance) are altogether groundless,
and very unmeet to proceed from a Christian: Consider what you are
a doing, to establish a Doctrine (the contrary whereof the greatest
part of mankind does believe) you run upon such precipices, as if you
are mistaken, and that is not impossible, must totally destroy all
Religion, Natural and Revealed; for suppose it were generally believed
according to you, that the Devil cannot appear, because if he could he
must be a God, independent, an unconquer'd enemy, and he doth appear
to us as we hear he hath to multitudes, both of the past and present
ages: In such a case what remains for us to do; but to fall down and
worship him. Upon the head of possession, you have recourse to that
instance of _Samson_, who was impowered by God, to the doing of things
beyond the Natural strength of common Men, and thence you say, we may
least learn the Nature of Possession by evil Spirits, this comparison
is indeed very odious, and I had rather think you have fallen into it
unawares; for what greater Blasphemy than that God and the Devil do act
the bodies, which the one and the other do possess in the same manner;
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account