The Witchcraft Delusion in New England: Its Rise, Progress, and Termination (Vol. 2 of 3)Mather, Cotton
History
The Witchcraft Delusion in New England: Its Rise, Progress, and Termination (Vol. 2 of 3)
Mather, Cotton
Witchcraft -- New England
With respect to the original Text, it is given as exactly like the
Original as a much better Type can be made to imitate an old Type of
166 Years ago. As to retaining all the Errors in the original Edition,
it was thought incompatible with the general good Taste of the Age.
Some, of a peculiar Nature, if judged necessary to show a Peculiarity
of the Times, may have been retained, and noted for such Peculiarity;
but a broken or imperfect Letter is discarded as unworthy of Imitation;
so transposed or inverted Letters are set right, as any good proof
Reader would have done, had he noticed them in the Original; but the
Orthography of that Day is scrupulously retained.
Why there was no Edition of the _More Wonders of the Invisible World_,
for ninety-six Years, will be found elsewhere explained. The Edition
of 1796 is the first American Edition. This bears the following
Imprint: "PRINTED IN LONDON IN the Year 1700. | _Reprinted in_ SALEM,
_Massachusetts_, 1796, | By WILLIAM CARLTON. | _Sold at CUSHING &
CARLTON'S Book Store, at the Bible | and Heart, Essex-Street._" The
Volume is in Duodecimo, and contains 318 Pages. The second Salem
Edition is in the same Form, and contains 309 Pages, exclusive of
the Article headed "GILES CORY," which occupies three Pages; hence
Copies of this Edition contain 312 Pages. Its Imprint--all in small
Capitals--is thus: "Printed in London, A. D. 1700. | Reprinted in
Salem, by John D. and T. C. Cushing, Jr. | for Cushing and Appleton.
1823." The Publishers of this Edition added the Article _Giles Cory_,
at the Suggestion of MR. DAVID PULSIFER, then employed in the Office
where the _Witchcraft Records_ were kept, as he many Years ago informed
me.
The second Salem Edition appears to have been copied from the
first--that of 1796. In some Instances slight Departures are made
from the Copy; and in all these, such Departures are also Departures
from the Original. As late as 1796, it might be expected that some
Uniformity would have been observed, as long as no Exactness was
intended in respect to the kind of Type used in reprinting an old
Work--Uniformity in denoting Quotations; but there is no Exactness
in this respect in either Edition. In the first, as will be seen,
sometimes Brackets are used to distinguish Quotations, but generally
italic Type is employed for that Purpose. In the second, inverted
Commas are generally used, sometimes Brackets. I have followed the
Original, bracketing and italicising as I find it. Inverted Commas to
denote Extracts, Quotations and the possessive Case of Nouns have been
introduced by Writers and Printers mainly, since the Time of Mr. Calef.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account