When men advance as an argument against women’s rights the fear that
women will lose their womanliness in public life, the older feminists
answer that womanliness, especially motherliness, is rooted too firmly
in nature to make it possible for this danger to exist. Nothing has,
however, become more clear in this amaternalistic time than that
motherliness is _not_ an indestructible instinct. Just as our time
produces in increasing numbers sterile women and women incapable of
nursing their children, so it produces more and more psychically
amaternal women. We can pass in silence the cases of children martyred
in families or in children’s homes, for sexual perversity and religious
fanaticism often play a rôle in such connections; we can also pass by
the millions of mothers who bring about the abortion of their offspring,
for the poor are driven to such practices largely by necessity, the rich
mostly by love of pleasure. There still remain a sufficient number of
women in whom the mother instinct has faded away because of a course of
thought like that just described. Our time furnishes manifold proofs of
the fact that the mother instinct can easily be weakened, or even
entirely disappear, although the erotic impulse continues to live; that
motherliness is not a spontaneous natural instinct, but the product of
thousands of years not merely of _child-bearing_, but also of
_child-rearing_; and that it must be strengthened in each new generation
by the personal care which mothers bestow upon their children. A woman
learns to love the strange child whom she nurses as if it were her own;
a father who can devote himself to the care of his little children is
possessed by an almost “motherly tenderness” for them, as are also older
brothers and sisters for the little ones whom they care for. But while
those who advocate the cause of the amaternal women draw from such facts
the conclusion that motherliness cannot be used as a criterion of
womanliness, yet an entirely different conclusion forces itself upon
everyone who sees in the united uplift of the individual and of mankind
the criterion of the life-enhancing effect of the woman movement, the
conclusion that the amaternal soul not only confirms the worst
apprehensions of men in regard to the results of the woman movement, but
also constitutes the greatest danger to the woman movement itself. For
the amaternal ideas will evoke a violent reaction _on the part of men_,
in case such a reaction does not appear at an early stage on the part of
women.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account