Folk-migrations, crusades, slave rebellions, revolutions have led a
race, a class, a group, beyond certain geographical or social
boundaries. The emancipation of women has shifted and extended the
limits of the freedom of movement of _half mankind_. No wonder that the
extent of the movement _in and for itself_ was advanced as proof of the
infallibility of its direction. All points of departure, the natural
right of man, individual freedom, social necessity—all led out into the
sun, which, in society as in nature, should radiate over woman as well
as over man; they led up onto the summit where man and woman both should
breathe the air of the heights. All obstacles which were raised with the
help of arguments such as, “the nature of woman,” “the welfare of the
family,” “the idea of society,” “the purpose of God”—all proved
temporary. And of necessity—for the innermost law of life, the law of
development, of life enhancement, carried the movement forward. When it
began, the Biblical expression about the wind was quoted, “Man knows not
whence it comes nor whither it goes.” Now all know it. Now the spirit of
the time speaks with “feminist” voice. The ideas of emancipation “are in
the air,” like bacilli, by which only savages are thus far wholly
untouched.
There are now no great movements of the time whose path does not run
parallel with or cut across the woman movement. Every new generation is
involuntarily and unconsciously drawn along with it. The ends already
attained seem to the present age obvious; the ends, for which man is
still struggling to-day, will appear equally obvious to the future. The
woman movement is now a power with which even its most bitter
adversaries must reckon. And this force has so quickly attained
prominence exactly as a result of fanaticism. Just as the White and the
Blue Nile mingle their waters in the main stream, so in every great
current of time enthusiasm is mingled with fanaticism. And it is the
latter which bears the most fruit, for it gives power of growth to the
passions of the majority, good as well as bad.
Every great idea begins with great promulgators. The promulgator who has
the spirit does not hold to the letter. And the woman movement which was
spirit began also with women and men who did not follow the call of the
spirit of the time; no, who from lonely heights sent out their awakening
call _to_ the time. Men who give their age new ideals have always
religious natures. This means, according to a good definition, that they
are “individualists in their being, social in their action.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account