The Women of the ConfederacyUnderwood, J. L. (John Levi)
History
The Women of the Confederacy
Underwood, J. L. (John Levi)
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Anecdotes; Women -- Confederate States of America
This Irishman's unionism is a fair sample of what sometimes passes in
this country as broad patriotism. "We don't believe in so much State
and State's right. We want a nation and we want it spelt with a big
N." This is the merest twaddle. From the very nature of the formation
of our government there can be no organized Nation. Alexander Hamilton
wrote, "The State governments are essentially necessary to the form
and spirit of the general system. * * * They can never lose their
powers till the whole of America are robbed of their liberties." It is
a Union of States and can be made nothing else. Bancroft, the great
historian, says: "But for Staterights the Union would perish from the
paralysis of its limbs. The States, as they gave life to the Union,
are necessary to the continuance of that life."
Madison wrote as follows: "The assent and ratification of the people,
not as individuals composing the entire nation, but as composing the
distinct and independent States to which they belong, are the sources
of the Constitution. It is therefore not a National but a Federal
compact."
The Irishman could only belong to the "whole of 'em" by belonging to
one of them. No man can love all the other States without loving his
own State. A Swiss loves Schwyz or Unterwalden or some other canton
before he loves the Confederation of Cantons. The loyal Scotchmen love
Scotland before they love the British Empire. The Union man loves the
Union through his immediate part of Union. Daniel Webster loved the
Union, but his speeches show how he loved Massachusetts first. Calhoun
loved the Union, but he loved it as a Federal Union with his beloved
Carolina. Many of the best people of the North loved their several
States and in loyalty to them took sides against the South.
The Southern people, Whigs and Democrats, were devoted to the Union of
the fathers as long as it was a reality. But as soon as they realized
that it had become only a confederation of the Northern majority
States, with the protecting features of the old Constitution directly
discarded, the love for their own States led them heart and soul into
the Confederate cause. Our Irishman might be satisfied with A Union,
but nothing but THE Union of the fathers could satisfy Southern men.
They loved the definite Union of 1789; they fought the indefinite
Union of 1861. The former was a union on a Constitution without a
flag; the latter was a mere sentimental union under a flag without a
Constitution. The Constitution had been thrown away.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account