The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminismMaulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
History
The women of the Renaissance : $b A study of feminism
Maulde-La-Clavière, R. de (René)
Feminism -- France -- History; Feminism -- Italy -- History; Renaissance; Women -- History -- Renaissance, 1450-1600
On the contrary, Monsieur Poirier was highly esteemed in industrial
countries—the Low Countries, for example, while as to the Italians,
they, openly and unashamed, regarded big dowries as at once legitimate
and desirable. They had the courage of their opinion—for instance, that
physician of Pistoja who had to choose between two girls, one of whom was
warranted a sensible creature, while the other was less sensible, but
richer by three hundred crowns. The doctor did not hesitate an instant
in choosing the richer, for in his opinion the risks were equal, and
the difference pointed out between them was not worth a few crowns. No
Italian was at all loth to marry a woman who brought him a dowry large
enough to live on. At Florence fifty crowns a year would almost keep a
household of moderate tastes, and a woman of the lower middle-class as
a rule received a dowry of two or three thousand florins, which yielded
an income of at least a hundred and fifty florins. The Visconti and the
Sforza, by means of dowries which were by all accounts colossal, got
their daughters into the principal royal houses of Europe. In short, the
Italian system continued to exercise a wonderful fascination even over
outsiders, and in starting on the expeditions to Italy more than one
French noble fancied that a rich wife would be the reward of his prowess.
It is not very surprising that these ideas at length overcame all
resistance in France. Louis XI., who was a pupil of the Sforza, did much
in this as in other things to snap the chains of the old traditions. We
have elsewhere related how lightheartedly he made and unmade marriages,
with the sole object of rewarding various adventurers at the expense of
the most honourable families.
Louis XII., on the contrary, set himself passionately to oppose these new
manners. Although he plumed himself on his chivalry as much as anyone, he
did not admit that the heat of passion could excuse the abduction of a
young girl, even if she were rich—and in such cases she was almost always
rich. His firmness did not prevent some picturesque exploits; but the
authority of the church, with its strong weapon the canon laws, lent him
aid.
We have moreover had occasion to show elsewhere how much difficulty
Charles VIII. had, after the event, in getting the legitimacy of his
marriage with the heiress of Brittany acknowledged.[107]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account