The Wonderful Story of Washington: and the Meaning of His Life for the Youth and Patriotism of AmericaStevens, C. M. (Charles McClellan)
History
The Wonderful Story of Washington: and the Meaning of His Life for the Youth and Patriotism of America
Stevens, C. M. (Charles McClellan)
Washington, George, 1732-1799 -- Juvenile literature
But, it so happened that on the same day, after this letter had been
sent away, he received the news that he had been appointed
commander-in-chief of all the forces of Virginia, and upon the terms
he had outlined to his friends. Besides, his closest friends were
appointed officers next in command to him.
This was a triumph over Governor Dinwiddie, who had a special favorite
whom he had pressed hard for the appointment. It was also made for a
man who had risen to that esteem among his countrymen, not through
victories but through defeats, not through success but through
failure. And, it must be remembered, that Washington was not yet
twenty-four years old. But the general esteem in which he was held
may be gathered from a statement made in a sermon at the time of his
appointment, by the Rev. Samuel Davis. It might have been mere
enthusiasm, but, in the light of such great subsequent events, it
looked like prophecy.
He turned from his religious theme to the needs of the colonies, and
then spoke of “that heroic youth, Colonel George Washington, whom I
can not but hope Providence has hitherto preserved in so signal a
manner for some important service to his country.”
CHAPTER VII
THE FATE OF THE OHIO VALLEY
I. FRONTIER FEARS AND PANICS
There was an abundance of responsibility at once for Washington in his
new official position. All the frontiers were being attacked by
Indians urged on by the French. Washington tried to get his troops
together to meet the Indians at the outposts, but he was unable at the
main post to muster more than twenty-five of the militia. The others
declared that if they had to die they preferred to die with their
women and children.
In his first report to the Governor, he wrote, “No orders are obeyed,
but such as a party of soldiers or my own drawn sword enforces.
Without this, not a single horse, for the most earnest occasion, can
be had,--to such a pitch has the insolence of these people arrived, by
having every point hitherto submitted to them. However, I have given
up none, where His Majesty’s service requires the contrary, and where
my proceedings are justified by my instructions; nor will I, unless
they execute what they threaten,--that is, to blow out our brains.”
This was naturally at the period of Washington’s greatest loyalty to
his Sovereign, and also shows that some of Braddock’s notions of
military authority still lingered with him. Perhaps it is better to
say that he recognized the military necessity for obedient discipline
in a common purpose and result, or there could be no successful army.
We may easily guess that the insolence to which he refers was the
frontiersman’s disrespect for military authority and his growing
belief in his own right to choose the manner of his service or his
death. These men had been as badly treated by the Braddock style of
authority as Washington had been, and most of his troubles doubtless
arose from their memory of insolence in the officers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account