The Wonders of Life: A Popular Study of Biological PhilosophyHaeckel, Ernst
Philosophy
The Wonders of Life: A Popular Study of Biological Philosophy
Haeckel, Ernst
Biology; Evolution (Biology); Life -- Origin
The comparison of life to a flame is particularly suitable for
helping us to realize the relation between form and metabolism. The
butterfly-shape of a gas-flame has a very characteristic outline.
At the base, immediately above the burner, there is still complete
darkness; over this is a blue and faintly luminous zone; and over
this again the bright flame expands on either side like the wings of
a butterfly. This peculiar form of the flame, with its characteristic
features, which are permanent, as long as we do not interfere with
the gas or the environment, is solely due to the fact that the
grouping of the molecules of the gas and the oxygen at various parts
of the flame is constant, though the molecules themselves change
every moment. At the base of the flame the molecules of the gas are
so thickly pressed that the oxygen necessary for their combustion
cannot penetrate; hence the darkness we find here. In the bluish
zone a few molecules of oxygen have combined with the molecules of
the gas: we have a faint light as the result. But in the body of
the flame the molecules of the gas are so freely combined with the
oxygen of the atmosphere that we have a lively combustion. However,
the exchange of matter (metabolism) between the outpouring gas and
the surrounding air is so regulated that we always find the same
molecules in the same quantity at the same spot. Thus we get the
permanent flame, with all its characteristics. But if we alter the
circulation by lessening the stream of gas, the shape of the flame
changes, because now the disposition of the molecules on both sides
is different. Thus the study of the gas-jet gives us, even in detail,
the features we find in the structure of the cell.
The scientific soundness of this metaphor is all the more notable as
the phrase, "the flame of life," has long been familiar both in poetry
and popular parlance.
In the sense in which science usually employs the word "organism,"
and in which we employ it here, it is equivalent to "living thing" or
"living body." The opposite to it, in the broad sense, is the anorganic
or inorganic body. Hence the word "organism" belongs to physiology,
and connotes essentially the visible life-activity of the body, its
metabolism, nutrition, and reproduction.
However, in most organisms we find, when we examine their structure
closely, that this consists of various parts, and that these parts
are put together for the evident purpose of accomplishing the vital
functions. We call them _organs_, and the manner in which they are
combined, apparently on a definite plan, is their _organization_. In
this respect, we compare the organism to a machine in which some one
has similarly combined a number of (lifeless) parts for a definite
purpose, but according to a preconceived and rationally initiated
design.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account