The second instrument, the thaumatrope, is constructed on the same
principle. It consists of a certain number of circular discs of card
three or four inches across, which are capable of being turned on their
axes with great rapidity by means of the finger and thumb and a couple
of silk threads fixed at opposite sides of their circumference. On each
of these discs a design is painted, one-half appearing on one side, and
the other half on the other, in such a manner that the two parts form a
single picture. You may have, for instance, Harlequin on one side and
Columbine on the other, but on turning the card you will see them
together. The body of a Turk may be drawn on one side and his head on
the other, and, by rotating the card, the head suddenly finds a pair of
shoulders to fit it. A sentence may be divided in the same way, or the
words, or even the letters, may be divided between the opposite sides of
the card: in fact, like the phenakistiscope, the designs applicable to
this little instrument are endless.
The third of these instruments, the phantascope, is constructed in
accordance with the peculiar power possessed by the eyes of adapting
themselves to the distance of the objects they are looking at. Everybody
must have noticed that in order to see objects plainly that are placed
at different distances we insensibly alter the position and focus of the
eyes, and that, consequently, objects even in the same plane as those we
are looking at are not perceived by us until something calls our
attention to them, and causes us to alter the position and focus of our
eyes and fix our gaze on them. For instance, in looking at a canary in a
cage, we have but a confused idea of the wires, which we will suppose to
be midway between the bird and the observer. But if anything attracts
our attention to the wires we lose sight of the bird, or at any rate see
it only as a confused mass. If this experiment is made with care, it
will be perceived that the object seen confusedly is always double,—a
fact that may be verified by interposing the finger between the eyes and
any object. When we look at the finger, the distant object will seem to
be doubled; if we look at the object, it is the finger that undergoes
duplication.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account