Chemists cannot actually weigh the mass of an atom of an element on a
pair of scales, or by any other method. But if we put down 16 as the
“atomic weight” of oxygen, and ascertain the “combining weight” (ratio)
of hydrogen to oxygen, we can determine the “atomic weight” of hydrogen
(1.008). (See Shipley, “The A B C of the Electron Theory of Matter,”
p. 14, Little Blue Book, No. 603.) The ratio of the masses of _any_
two elements in a chemical compound can be very accurately determined.
Without going into the details here, it may be said that the _relative_
weights of the atoms of any element can be determined to 0.01% in many
cases (by chemical analysis and synthesis); while the _actual_ weight
of any atom has not yet been determined to better than 0.1%.
HOW RADIUM IS CONVERTED TO LEAD
Lead is produced from uranium by a successive series of losses of Alpha
particles--or helium atoms. Omitting the less essential outcomes, or
transition stages, we find that each atom of uranium spontaneously
ejects three atoms of another element, helium, and thereby is
converted into still another element, radium. By losing one atom of
helium, radium, in turn, is converted into the so-called emanation,
or _niton_. The latter quickly loses four more atoms of helium and
is converted into lead, “uranium lead,” having an atomic weight of
206.08. Ordinary (common) lead, constituting the vast bulk of the lead
of the world, has a much higher atomic weight, namely, 207 (Prof.
Theodore Richards). Lead from thorium has an atomic weight of 208; from
actinium, 206. So we have, in fact, four kinds of lead.
Omitting the less stable transition products, we may say, then, that
an atom of uranium is converted into lead by the loss of eight atoms
of helium--losing three to become radium, then one to become the
emanation, and finally four to become lead. No known human agency can
either retard or hasten this breaking down of the uranium atom into
radium, or of the radium into emanation, with the final production of
lead.
This statement has been universally accepted as true. Nevertheless,
Dr. A. Glaschler stated (_Nature_ [London], September 12, 1925) that
he had succeeded in accelerating the change of uranium to uranium X
(the first product of uranium 1) by submitting uranium oxide to “strong
rushes of momentary high-tension currents.” As early as 1923, A. Nodon
(_Comp. rend., 176_, 1705 [1923]) brought forward strong evidence of
an increase of the activity of radioactive substances when outdoors
and enclosed by envelopes of small absorbing power for Gamma rays as
contrasted to the smaller radioactivity of the same substances in
cellars and when heavily enveloped by lead. For a tentative explanation
of this phenomenon, see _Science_, January 8, 1926 (Vol. LXIII, No.
1619), pp. 44–45.
Both uranium and thorium, as we have just stated, break down and become
radium, then change to helium and lead.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account