Besides this Theam is worn too thread-bare by the whiffling would-be
Wits of the Town, and of both the stone-blind-eyes of the Kingdom. And
therefore to return to that which I before was speaking of, I will have
leave to say that in my judgement the increasing number of our latter
Plays have not done much more towards the amending of men’s Morals, or
their Wit, than hath the frequent Preaching, which this last age hath
been pester’d with, (indeed without all Controversie they have done
less harm) nor can I 223 once imagine what temptation anyone can have
to expect it from them; for sure I am no Play was ever writ with that
design. If you consider Tragedy, you’ll find their best of Characters
unlikely patterns for a wise man to pursue: For he that is the Knight
of the Play, no sublunary feats must serve his Dulcinea; for if he
can’t bestrid the Moon, he’ll ne’er make good his business to the end,
and if he chance to be offended, he must without considering right or
wrong confound all things he meets, and put you half-a-score likely
tall fellows into each pocket; and truly if he come not something near
this Pitch I think the Tragedy’s not worth a farthing; for Playes were
certainly intended for the exercising of men’s passions not their
understandings, and he is infinitely far from wise that will bestow one
moment’s meditation on such things: And as for Comedie, the finest
folks you meet with there are still unfitter for your imitation, for
though within a leaf or two of the Prologue, you are told that they are
people of Wit, good Humour, good Manners, and all that: yet if the
Authors did not kindly add their proper names, you’d never know them by
their Characters; for whatsoe’er’s the matter, it hath happen’d so
spightfully in several Playes, which have been prettie well received of
late, that even those persons that were meant to be the ingenious
Censors of the Play, have either prov’d the most debauch’d, or most
unwittie people in the Company: nor is this error very lamentable,
since as I take it Comedie was never meant, either for a converting or
a conforming Ordinance: In short, I think a Play the best divertisement
that wise men have: but I do also think them nothing so who do
discourse as formallie about the rules of it, as if ’twere the grand
affair of humane life. This being my opinion of Plays, I studied only
to make this as entertaining as I could, which whether I have been
successful in, my gentle Reader, you may for your shilling judge. To
tell you my thoughts of it, were to little purpose, for were they very
ill, you may be sure I would not have expos’d it; nor did I so till I
had first consulted most of those who have a reputation for judgement
of this kind; who were at least so civil (if not kind) to it as did
encourage me to venture it upon the Stage, and in the Press: Nor did I
take their single word for it, but us’d their reasons as a confirmation
of my own.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account