The Works of Daniel Webster, Volume 1Webster, Daniel
History
The Works of Daniel Webster, Volume 1
Webster, Daniel
United States -- Politics and government -- 1815-1861
Professional Character particularly in Reference to Constitutional
Law.--The Dartmouth College Case argued at Washington in 1818.--Mr.
Ticknor's Description of that Argument.--The Case of Gibbons and
Ogden in 1824.--Mr. Justice Wayne's Allusion to that Case in
1847.--The Case of Ogden and Saunders in 1827.--The Case of the
Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge.--The Alabama Bank
Case.--The Case relative to the Boundary between Massachusetts and
Rhode Island.--The Girard Will Case.--The Case of the Constitution
of Rhode Island.--General Remarks on Mr. Webster's Practice in the
Supreme Court of the United States.--Practice in the State
Courts.--The Case of Goodridge,--and the Case of Knapp.
With Mr. Webster's removal to Boston commenced a period of five or
six years' retirement from active political life, during which time,
with a single exception which will be hereafter alluded to, he
filled no public office, and devoted himself exclusively to the duties
of his profession. It was accordingly within this period that his
reputation as a lawyer was fixed and established. The promise of his
youth, and the expectations of those who had known him as a student,
were more than fulfilled. He took a position as a counsellor and an
advocate, above which no one has ever risen in the country. A large
share of the best business of New England passed into his hands; and the
veterans of the Boston bar admitted him to an entire equality of
standing, repute, and influence.
Besides the reputation which he acquired in the ordinary routine of
practice, Mr. Webster, shortly after his removal to Boston, took the
lead in establishing what might almost be called a new school of
constitutional law. It fell to his lot to perform a prominent part in
unfolding a most important class of constitutional doctrines, which,
either because occasion had not drawn them forth, or the jurists of a
former period had failed to deduce and apply them, had not yet grown
into a system. It was reserved for Mr. Webster to distinguish himself
before most, if not all, of his contemporaries, in this branch of his
profession. It may be mentioned as a somewhat curious coincidence, that
the case in which he made his first great effort in this direction arose
in his native State, and concerned the College in which he had been
educated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account